Skip to content

Runbook 01 — Third-Party Risk Assessment & Vendor Onboarding

Item Details
Runbook Type Third-Party Risk Management
Primary Role GRC Analyst / Third-Party Risk Analyst
Supporting Roles Procurement, Security, Privacy, Legal, Business Owner, IAM
Trigger New vendor or material vendor-service change
Objective Assess and approve third-party risk before production use
Primary Output Approved Vendor Risk Assessment & Onboarding Record
Review Frequency At least annually and after material changes

This runbook provides a repeatable operational process for evaluating and onboarding third parties.

Use it when an organization plans to introduce:

Cloud Provider
SaaS Platform
Software Vendor
Managed Service Provider
Consultant
Payment Processor
Data Processor
AI Provider
Business Partner
Technology Supplier

The runbook ensures that vendor onboarding follows:

Vendor Request
Business Intake
Inherent Risk
Vendor Tier
Assessment Scope
Due Diligence
Evidence Review
Findings
Residual Risk
Contract Requirements
Approval
Secure Onboarding
Monitoring

This runbook helps ensure that:

  • all new vendors enter through a controlled intake process.

  • vendor business owners are identified.

  • data and system exposure are understood.

  • inherent risk is determined before due diligence.

  • vendors are assigned appropriate risk tiers.

  • security, privacy, compliance, and resilience reviews are risk-based.

  • supporting evidence is collected and validated.

  • vendor-control gaps are documented.

  • residual risk is formally evaluated.

  • material risks are remediated or accepted by authorized owners.

  • contractual controls reflect identified risks.

  • third-party access is governed before provisioning.

  • onboarding is not completed until required controls are satisfied.

  • ongoing monitoring and reassessment requirements are defined.

Use this runbook for:

New Vendors
New SaaS Platforms
New Cloud Providers
New Managed Services
New Outsourcing Arrangements
New Data Processors
New AI Providers
Material Changes
to Existing Vendors

Material changes may include:

New Sensitive Data
New Production Access
New Privileged Access
New Country
New Subprocessor
New AI Functionality
Changed Hosting Model
Major Service Expansion
Role Responsibility
Business Owner Defines business need and owns relationship
Procurement Coordinates sourcing and contract workflow
TPRM / GRC Performs risk assessment and governance
Cybersecurity Reviews security controls
Privacy Reviews personal-data processing
Legal Reviews contractual and regulatory obligations
IAM Provisions approved third-party access
Business Continuity Reviews resilience where applicable
Risk Owner Accepts residual risk where authorized

Start this runbook when:

New Vendor Requested

or when:

Existing Vendor
Material Change

Do not wait until:

Contract Signed

or:

Vendor Already
in Production

to begin the assessment.

The vendor may complete onboarding when:

  • vendor intake is complete.

  • business owner is confirmed.

  • inherent risk is assessed.

  • vendor tier is assigned.

  • required due diligence is complete.

  • required evidence is validated.

  • critical findings are resolved or formally approved.

  • residual risk is documented.

  • security/privacy contractual requirements are addressed.

  • risk acceptance is approved where required.

  • onboarding conditions are completed.

  • monitoring requirements are established.

Capture:

Vendor Name
Requested Service
Business Purpose
Business Owner
Requested Go-Live Date

Create a unique assessment identifier:

TPRA-YYYY-####

Example:

TPRA-2026-0042

Step 1.2 — Open Vendor Assessment Record

Section titled “Step 1.2 — Open Vendor Assessment Record”

Create:

Vendor Assessment Record

Record:

Field Value
Assessment ID
Vendor
Service
Business Owner
Request Date
Requested Go-Live
Analyst
Status Intake

Ask:

Why Is the Vendor Needed?
What Business Process
Does It Support?
Who Will Use It?
Is an Approved
Alternative Available?

Document the justification.

If there is:

No Valid
Business Owner

or:

No Valid
Business Need

set status:

ON HOLD

and return the request for clarification.

Determine whether vendor will process:

Public Data
Internal Data
Confidential Data
Personal Data
Sensitive Personal Data
Payment Data
Authentication Data
Financial Data
Intellectual Property
Security Data

Determine:

No Access
Application Access
API Access
Network Access
Cloud Access
Production Access
Privileged Access

Document:

SSO
API
VPN
Database
Cloud Role
Agent
Webhook
File Transfer
Remote Support

Ask:

Where Is Data Stored?
Where Is It Processed?
Where Are Backups?
Where Can Support
Personnel Access It?

Request:

Vendor Subprocessor List

Document critical:

Cloud Providers
Hosting Providers
Support Providers
Model Providers
Payment Providers

Phase 3 — Perform Inherent Risk Assessment

Section titled “Phase 3 — Perform Inherent Risk Assessment”

Example:

Exposure Score
Public 1
Internal 2
Confidential 3
Restricted / Regulated 4
Access Score
None 1
Standard User 2
Production / API 3
Privileged 4
Criticality Score
Low 1
Medium 2
High 3
Critical 4
Exposure Score
Minimal 1
Limited 2
Significant 3
Regulated / Critical 4
Dependency Score
Easily Replaceable 1
Limited Dependency 2
Important 3
Essential 4

Example:

Data 4
Access 3
Criticality 4
Regulatory 4
Dependency 4
──
Total 19

Example thresholds:

Score Risk
5–8 Low
9–12 Medium
13–16 High
17–20 Critical

Use:

Inherent Risk Tier
Critical Tier 1
High Tier 2
Medium Tier 3
Low Tier 4

Record:

Vendor Tier

in the assessment record.

Require:

Detailed Security Assessment
Privacy Assessment
Compliance Review
BCP / DR Review
Independent Assurance
Pen-Test Evidence
Contract Security Review
Continuous Monitoring

Require:

Detailed Questionnaire
Security Evidence
Privacy Review if Applicable
Compliance Review
Resilience Review
Annual Reassessment

Require:

Standard Questionnaire
Risk-Based Evidence
Privacy Review if Applicable

Require:

Basic Screening

Send applicable modules:

Core Security
Privacy
Cloud
SaaS
Software
Resilience
AI

Record:

Sent Date
Vendor Due Date
Response Date

If questionnaire is overdue:

Day 7
Reminder
Day 14
Business Owner Reminder
Day 21
Escalate to Procurement

Adjust to organizational SLA.

Request as applicable:

SOC 2
ISO 27001 Certificate
Security Policies
Penetration-Test Summary
Vulnerability Management Evidence
Incident Response Plan
BCP / DR Evidence
Privacy Documentation
Subprocessor List

Also request:

AI Data Processing Terms
Model Provider Information
Training Policy
Prompt Retention
AI Subprocessor List
Deletion Capabilities

For every artifact verify:

Current?
Correct Vendor?
Correct Legal Entity?
Correct Service?
Correct Scope?
Valid Period?
Exceptions?
Independent?

Do not record:

SOC 2 Received

without also determining:

SOC 2 Reviewed

Check:

Type I / Type II
Audit Period
Scope
Opinion
Exceptions
Subservice Organizations
CUECs
Qualified Opinion
Repeated Critical Exceptions
Relevant Scope Excluded
Report Expired

Validate:

Certificate Number
Legal Entity
Scope
Locations
Issue Date
Expiry
Certification Body

Do not treat:

ISO Certified

as sufficient without validating scope.

Verify:

MFA
SSO
Least Privilege
RBAC
PAM
Access Reviews
Joiner / Mover / Leaver
Service Accounts

Escalate if:

Privileged Production Access
Without MFA

or:

Shared Administrative
Accounts

without appropriate controls.

Review:

Data at Rest
Data in Transit
Backups
Key Management
Key Rotation

Determine whether controls align with:

Data Classification

Phase 13 — Assess Vulnerability Management

Section titled “Phase 13 — Assess Vulnerability Management”

Review:

Scanning Frequency
Patch SLA
Critical Vulnerability Handling
Exception Process
Retesting

If vendor has:

Known Critical
Exploited Vulnerability

determine whether production onboarding should be blocked.

Verify:

Test Date
Scope
Independence
Critical Findings
High Findings
Remediation
Retesting

Do not treat:

Pen Test Completed

as sufficient if:

Critical Findings
Remain Open

For software vendors review:

Secure SDLC
Code Review
SAST
DAST
SCA
Dependency Management
Secrets Scanning
Threat Modeling
SBOM
Artifact Integrity

Review:

Authentication Logging
Administrative Logging
Security Events
Data Access
Log Retention
Monitoring
SOC / SIEM

Review:

Incident Response Plan
Testing
Customer Notification
Escalation
Forensics
Root Cause Analysis

Compare vendor capability with contractual requirements.

If personal data is processed, assess:

Data Categories
Purpose
Location
Retention
Deletion
Subprocessors
International Transfers
Data Subject Rights
Incident Notification

Escalate:

Indefinite Retention
Unapproved Secondary Use
Unknown Subprocessors
Unapproved Cross-Border Processing
Inability to Delete Data

For AI vendors determine:

Which Model?
Which Provider?
Are Prompts Retained?
Are Outputs Retained?
Is Customer Data
Used for Training?
Are Files Used
for Model Improvement?
Are Embeddings Stored?
Is Memory Persistent?
Can Data Be Deleted?

Escalate when:

Sensitive Enterprise Data
+
Provider Model Training

without approved controls.

Determine applicable:

SOC 1
SOC 2
ISO 27001
ISO 27017
ISO 27018
PCI DSS
Privacy Requirements
Industry Requirements

Map:

Requirement
Vendor Evidence
Gap

Review:

BCP
DR
Backup
RTO
RPO
Failover
Recovery Testing

Compare:

Business Requirement

against:

Vendor Capability
Required RTO:
4 Hours
Vendor RTO:
24 Hours

Record:

Resilience Finding

Identify:

Critical Subprocessors
Cloud Providers
Model Providers
Hosting Dependencies
Network Dependencies

Ask:

Could Failure
of a Fourth Party
Impact Our Service?

Check whether multiple services rely on:

Same Vendor
Same Cloud Provider
Same Region
Same Model Provider
Same Payment Provider

Record material dependencies.

Each finding should include:

Condition
Criteria
Risk
Severity
Evidence
Required Action

Example:

Vendor administrators
are not required
to use MFA.
Compromised credentials
could provide unauthorized
privileged access.
High
Implement mandatory MFA
for privileged users.

Use:

Critical
High
Medium
Low

Consider:

Likelihood
Impact
Data Sensitivity
Business Criticality
Exposure
Existing Controls

Use:

Effective
Partially Effective
Ineffective
Not Implemented
Not Applicable

Assess both:

Design Effectiveness

and:

Operating Effectiveness

Conceptually:

Inherent Risk
Vendor Controls
Control Effectiveness
Findings
Compensating Controls
Residual Risk

Use:

Low
Medium
High
Critical

Choose:

Avoid
Mitigate
Transfer
Accept

Do not use vendor.

Require remediation or additional controls.

Use contractual allocation or insurance where appropriate.

Obtain formal authorization.

If vendor cannot immediately remediate, possible controls include:

Data Minimization
Restricted Access
IP Allowlisting
Additional Monitoring
Tokenization
Customer-Side Encryption
No Sensitive Data
Limited Pilot

Ensure compensating controls address the actual risk.

Available outcomes:

APPROVED
APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS
REMEDIATION REQUIRED
ESCALATED
REJECTED

Use when:

Residual Risk
Within Tolerance

and no blocking issues remain.

Approval Criteria — Approved With Conditions

Section titled “Approval Criteria — Approved With Conditions”

Use when:

Risk Acceptable
for Limited Operation

provided defined remediation is completed.

Approval Criteria — Remediation Required

Section titled “Approval Criteria — Remediation Required”

Use when:

Material Risk
Must Be Reduced
Before Production

Use when:

Risk Exceeds
Analyst Authority

Use when:

Risk Cannot Be
Reduced to
Acceptable Level

For unresolved risks, create:

Risk Acceptance Record

Document:

Risk
Business Justification
Compensating Controls
Residual Risk
Owner
Approver
Expiry

Risk acceptance must be:

Authorized
+
Time-Bound
+
Reviewable

Phase 32 — Translate Findings Into Contract Requirements

Section titled “Phase 32 — Translate Findings Into Contract Requirements”

Send required items to:

Procurement
Legal

Examples:

Incident Notification
Data Deletion
Subprocessor Notification
Audit Rights
MFA Requirements
Security Testing
BCP / DR
Data Location
AI Training Restriction

Phase 33 — Review Contract Security Terms

Section titled “Phase 33 — Review Contract Security Terms”

Confirm relevant:

Security Addendum
DPA
SLA
Audit Rights
Incident Terms
Retention
Deletion
Subprocessors
Termination

are addressed.

If vendor rejects a required clause:

Contract Requirement
Vendor Exception
Risk Assessment
Approval

Do not silently remove the requirement.

Before onboarding verify:

Assessment Complete?
Approval Complete?
Contract Complete?
Blocking Findings Resolved?
Risk Acceptance Approved?
Access Requirements Defined?

If any mandatory item is:

No

hold onboarding.

If vendor requires internal access, determine:

Named Accounts
Business Approval
Least Privilege
MFA
PAM
JIT
Expiry
Logging

For integrations verify:

Account Owner
Purpose
Least Privilege
Secret Storage
Rotation
Expiration
Monitoring

Check:

API Authentication
Token Scope
Credential Storage
Rotation
Logging
Rate Limiting

For VPN / network access:

Vendor
Restricted Segment
Required System

Avoid:

Vendor
Entire Internal Network

Create:

Vendor Onboarding Checklist

Verify:

  • named vendor identities created.

  • MFA enabled.

  • least privilege applied.

  • access expiry configured.

  • PAM used where required.

  • service accounts documented.

  • API credentials protected.

  • network access restricted.

  • audit logs enabled.

  • vendor owner confirmed.

Before sending production data verify:

Data Approved?
Minimum Necessary?
Encryption?
Region Approved?
Retention Defined?
DPA Executed?

For AI vendors verify:

Approved Use Cases
Permitted Data
Training Disabled
where Required
Retention Configured
Model Provider Approved
Subprocessors Reviewed
Sensitive Data Restrictions
Logging Enabled

Create:

Vendor Approval Record

Include:

Field Value
Vendor
Service
Tier
Inherent Risk
Residual Risk
Open Findings
Decision
Conditions
Risk Owner
Approval Date
Next Review

Add:

Vendor
Business Owner
Service
Tier
Inherent Risk
Residual Risk
Findings
Risk Acceptance
Decision
Monitoring
Next Review

Phase 45 — Define Monitoring Requirements

Section titled “Phase 45 — Define Monitoring Requirements”

Use risk tier.

Continuous Monitoring
Quarterly Governance Review
Annual Assessment
Annual SOC Review
Pen-Test Review
Incident Monitoring
Critical Vulnerability Monitoring
Quarterly / Annual Monitoring
Annual Assessment
Evidence Review
Finding Monitoring
Annual / Event-Based Review
Renewal / Event-Driven Review

Trigger reassessment after:

Security Breach
Major Outage
New Data Type
New Production Access
New Privileged Access
New Country
New Subprocessor
AI Feature Change
Acquisition
Certification Loss
Critical Vulnerability

Phase 47 — Define Vendor Finding Monitoring

Section titled “Phase 47 — Define Vendor Finding Monitoring”

For each finding track:

Owner
Due Date
Severity
Status
Evidence
Retest

Example:

High Finding
Past Due
Vendor Owner
TPRM
Risk Committee

based on defined thresholds.

Phase 49 — Monitor Risk Acceptance Expiry

Section titled “Phase 49 — Monitor Risk Acceptance Expiry”

Before expiry:

30 Days
Reminder

then determine:

Remediated?
Renew Acceptance?
Escalate?
Stop Service?

If vendor reports an incident:

Open Vendor Incident Record

Assess:

Our Data?
Our Systems?
Our Users?
Our Operations?
Regulatory Impact?
Contract SLA?

If material:

Vendor Incident
Trigger Reassessment
Update Residual Risk

Track:

SOC Reports
ISO Certificates
Pen Tests
Insurance
BCP Tests

Set alerts before expiry.

Before renewal reassess:

Current Risk
Open Findings
Incidents
SLA
Evidence
Subprocessors
Service Changes
Contract Exceptions

If vendor relationship ends:

Contract End
Access Removal
Token Revocation
Data Return
Data Deletion
Evidence

Verify:

  • user accounts disabled.

  • privileged accounts disabled.

  • VPN removed.

  • API keys revoked.

  • service accounts disabled.

  • tokens revoked.

  • certificates revoked.

  • integrations removed.

  • data returned.

  • data deleted.

  • deletion evidence retained.

Immediately escalate when:

Critical Residual Risk
Confirmed Vendor Breach
Unresolved Critical Finding
Privileged Access Without MFA
Material Data Residency Issue
Vendor Refuses Required Security Terms
Critical Certification Loss
Major Resilience Failure
Unapproved High-Risk Subprocessor
TPRM Analyst
TPRM Manager / GRC
Cybersecurity / Privacy
Business Risk Owner
Risk Committee
Executive Management

Use standardized statuses:

Requested
Intake
Risk Tiering
Assessment
Waiting for Vendor
Evidence Review
Remediation
Risk Approval
Contract Review
Onboarding
Approved
Rejected
Monitoring
Terminated

Retain:

Vendor Intake
Inherent Risk Assessment
Questionnaire
SOC Reports
ISO Certificates
Pen-Test Evidence
Privacy Evidence
BCP / DR Evidence
Findings
Risk Treatment
Risk Acceptance
Approval
Contracts
Onboarding Evidence
Monitoring Records
TPRA-2026-0042/
├── 01 Intake/
├── 02 Inherent Risk/
├── 03 Questionnaire/
├── 04 Security Evidence/
├── 05 Privacy Evidence/
├── 06 Compliance Evidence/
├── 07 Resilience/
├── 08 Findings/
├── 09 Remediation/
├── 10 Risk Acceptance/
├── 11 Contract/
├── 12 Approval/
├── 13 Onboarding/
└── 14 Monitoring/

Track:

Assessment Completion Time
Vendors Assessed Before Onboarding
Evidence Completion
Critical Findings
Overdue Findings
Risk Acceptance
Assessment Coverage
Monitoring Coverage
Vendors Assessed
Before Production
──────────────── × 100
New Vendors

Target:

100%
Assessments Completed
Within SLA
──────────────────── × 100
Assessments Completed
Required Critical
Evidence Received
──────────────── × 100
Critical Evidence Required

KRI — Critical Vendor Without Assessment

Section titled “KRI — Critical Vendor Without Assessment”
Critical Vendors
Operating Without
Current Assessment

Target:

0
Open Critical
Vendor Findings

Target:

0
Vendor Risks
Operating Past
Approved Expiry

Target:

0

Scenario 1 — Business Already Purchased Vendor

Section titled “Scenario 1 — Business Already Purchased Vendor”

Do not skip risk assessment.

Perform:

Emergency Intake
Risk Assessment
Control Restrictions
Formal Decision

and document process failure.

Scenario 2 — Vendor Refuses Questionnaire

Section titled “Scenario 2 — Vendor Refuses Questionnaire”

Seek alternative assurance:

SOC Report
ISO Evidence
Security Portal
Independent Audit
Controlled Evidence Review

If assurance remains insufficient:

Record Assurance Gap
Increase Residual Risk

Scenario 3 — Vendor Will Not Provide Pen Test

Section titled “Scenario 3 — Vendor Will Not Provide Pen Test”

Assess whether:

SOC 2
Independent Security Audit
Certification
Alternative Evidence

provides adequate assurance.

If not:

Risk Exception

may be required.

Scenario 4 — Business Demands Immediate Go-Live

Section titled “Scenario 4 — Business Demands Immediate Go-Live”

Use:

Documented Risk
Restricted Scope
Compensating Controls
Temporary Approval
Defined Expiry

only where appropriate and authorized.

Scenario 5 — Critical Finding Discovered

Section titled “Scenario 5 — Critical Finding Discovered”

Do not automatically continue onboarding.

Determine:

Can It Be Remediated
Before Production?

If no:

Can Risk Be
Acceptably Compensated?

If no:

Escalate / Reject

Trigger:

AI Risk Review

before sensitive enterprise data is used.

Scenario 7 — New Subprocessor Identified

Section titled “Scenario 7 — New Subprocessor Identified”

Review:

Service
Data
Location
Security
Privacy
Contract Rights
Vendor Requested
Business Need Valid?
├── No → Stop
└── Yes
Inherent Risk
Risk Tier
Required Assessment
Evidence Complete?
├── No → Obtain / Escalate
└── Yes
Critical Finding?
┌──────┴──────┐
Yes No
↓ ↓
Can Remediate? Residual Risk
│ ↓
┌───┴───┐ Within Appetite?
Yes No │
↓ ↓ ┌───┴───┐
Remediate Compensate? Yes No
│ ↓ ↓
┌───┴───┐ Approve Escalate
Yes No
↓ ↓
Accept? Reject
  • assessment record created.

  • business owner confirmed.

  • service documented.

  • business need validated.

  • go-live date captured.

  • data identified.

  • access identified.

  • integrations documented.

  • criticality determined.

  • regulatory exposure assessed.

  • fourth parties identified.

  • risk factors scored.

  • inherent risk calculated.

  • vendor tier assigned.

  • assessment scope determined.

  • questionnaire completed.

  • evidence received.

  • evidence current.

  • evidence scope validated.

  • SOC/ISO reviewed where applicable.

  • pen-test evidence reviewed.

  • IAM reviewed.

  • MFA reviewed.

  • privileged access reviewed.

  • encryption reviewed.

  • vulnerability management reviewed.

  • secure development reviewed.

  • logging reviewed.

  • incident response reviewed.

  • personal data identified.

  • purpose reviewed.

  • data location reviewed.

  • retention reviewed.

  • deletion reviewed.

  • subprocessors reviewed.

  • cross-border processing reviewed.

  • BCP reviewed.

  • DR reviewed.

  • RTO compared.

  • RPO compared.

  • backup assessed.

  • recovery testing reviewed.

  • model provider identified.

  • training use reviewed.

  • prompt retention reviewed.

  • outputs reviewed.

  • embeddings reviewed.

  • AI memory reviewed.

  • subprocessors reviewed.

  • deletion reviewed.

  • findings documented.

  • severity assigned.

  • remediation defined.

  • owner assigned.

  • due date assigned.

  • control effectiveness evaluated.

  • compensating controls considered.

  • residual risk determined.

  • risk appetite checked.

  • decision documented.

  • conditions documented.

  • authorized approval obtained.

  • risk acceptance documented where applicable.

  • security requirements mapped.

  • privacy terms reviewed.

  • incident terms reviewed.

  • audit rights reviewed.

  • subprocessor requirements reviewed.

  • retention/deletion reviewed.

  • exceptions documented.

  • access requirements approved.

  • MFA enabled.

  • least privilege applied.

  • service accounts governed.

  • API credentials governed.

  • network access restricted.

  • logging enabled.

  • monitoring frequency established.

  • reassessment date assigned.

  • material-change triggers defined.

  • finding monitoring established.

  • evidence expiry tracked.

  • risk-acceptance expiry tracked.

At completion, the analyst should produce:

Vendor Assessment Record
Inherent Risk Assessment
Vendor Tier
Due Diligence Evidence Pack
Vendor Findings Register
Residual Risk Assessment
Risk Treatment Plan
Risk Acceptance Record
Contract Requirements
Vendor Approval Record
Onboarding Checklist
Monitoring Plan

A successfully completed runbook should allow the organization to answer:

Why Are We
Using This Vendor?
What Data
Do They Process?
What Access
Do They Have?
How Critical
Are They?
What Is Their
Inherent Risk?
What Controls
Do They Have?
What Evidence
Supports Those Controls?
What Findings
Remain?
What Is the
Residual Risk?
What Must
Be Remediated?
Who Accepted
Any Remaining Risk?
What Contract
Controls Apply?
Was Onboarding
Performed Securely?
How Will We
Monitor Them?
When Will We
Reassess Them?

The runbook is successful when:

No Third Party
Enters Production
Without Appropriate
Risk Evaluation

and every material vendor has:

Owner
+
Risk Tier
+
Assessment
+
Evidence
+
Decision
+
Monitoring

➡️ Next: Runbook 02 — Third-Party Risk Monitoring, Incident Escalation & Vendor Offboarding

In the next runbook, you will move from initial vendor assessment and onboarding to operating the vendor relationship throughout its lifecycle.

You will work through:

Approved Vendor
Continuous Monitoring
Risk Signals
Vendor Incident
Material Change
Reassessment
Finding / Remediation
Risk Escalation
Contract Renewal
Vendor Exit
Access Revocation
Data Return & Deletion

The runbook will provide an operational process for continuous vendor monitoring, security-incident handling, risk-trigger validation, event-driven reassessment, finding escalation, risk-acceptance review, contract renewal, vendor termination, access revocation, data deletion, and evidence-based closure.