Runbook 01 — Third-Party Risk Assessment & Vendor Onboarding
Runbook Information
Section titled “Runbook Information”| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Runbook Type | Third-Party Risk Management |
| Primary Role | GRC Analyst / Third-Party Risk Analyst |
| Supporting Roles | Procurement, Security, Privacy, Legal, Business Owner, IAM |
| Trigger | New vendor or material vendor-service change |
| Objective | Assess and approve third-party risk before production use |
| Primary Output | Approved Vendor Risk Assessment & Onboarding Record |
| Review Frequency | At least annually and after material changes |
Purpose
Section titled “Purpose”This runbook provides a repeatable operational process for evaluating and onboarding third parties.
Use it when an organization plans to introduce:
Cloud Provider
SaaS Platform
Software Vendor
Managed Service Provider
Consultant
Payment Processor
Data Processor
AI Provider
Business Partner
Technology SupplierThe runbook ensures that vendor onboarding follows:
Vendor Request ↓Business Intake ↓Inherent Risk ↓Vendor Tier ↓Assessment Scope ↓Due Diligence ↓Evidence Review ↓Findings ↓Residual Risk ↓Contract Requirements ↓Approval ↓Secure Onboarding ↓MonitoringRunbook Objectives
Section titled “Runbook Objectives”This runbook helps ensure that:
-
all new vendors enter through a controlled intake process.
-
vendor business owners are identified.
-
data and system exposure are understood.
-
inherent risk is determined before due diligence.
-
vendors are assigned appropriate risk tiers.
-
security, privacy, compliance, and resilience reviews are risk-based.
-
supporting evidence is collected and validated.
-
vendor-control gaps are documented.
-
residual risk is formally evaluated.
-
material risks are remediated or accepted by authorized owners.
-
contractual controls reflect identified risks.
-
third-party access is governed before provisioning.
-
onboarding is not completed until required controls are satisfied.
-
ongoing monitoring and reassessment requirements are defined.
Use this runbook for:
New Vendors
New SaaS Platforms
New Cloud Providers
New Managed Services
New Outsourcing Arrangements
New Data Processors
New AI Providers
Material Changesto Existing VendorsMaterial changes may include:
New Sensitive Data
New Production Access
New Privileged Access
New Country
New Subprocessor
New AI Functionality
Changed Hosting Model
Major Service ExpansionRoles and Responsibilities
Section titled “Roles and Responsibilities”| Role | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Business Owner | Defines business need and owns relationship |
| Procurement | Coordinates sourcing and contract workflow |
| TPRM / GRC | Performs risk assessment and governance |
| Cybersecurity | Reviews security controls |
| Privacy | Reviews personal-data processing |
| Legal | Reviews contractual and regulatory obligations |
| IAM | Provisions approved third-party access |
| Business Continuity | Reviews resilience where applicable |
| Risk Owner | Accepts residual risk where authorized |
Entry Criteria
Section titled “Entry Criteria”Start this runbook when:
New Vendor Requestedor when:
Existing Vendor ↓Material ChangeDo not wait until:
Contract Signedor:
Vendor Alreadyin Productionto begin the assessment.
Exit Criteria
Section titled “Exit Criteria”The vendor may complete onboarding when:
-
vendor intake is complete.
-
business owner is confirmed.
-
inherent risk is assessed.
-
vendor tier is assigned.
-
required due diligence is complete.
-
required evidence is validated.
-
critical findings are resolved or formally approved.
-
residual risk is documented.
-
security/privacy contractual requirements are addressed.
-
risk acceptance is approved where required.
-
onboarding conditions are completed.
-
monitoring requirements are established.
Phase 1 — Vendor Request Intake
Section titled “Phase 1 — Vendor Request Intake”Step 1.1 — Receive Vendor Request
Section titled “Step 1.1 — Receive Vendor Request”Capture:
Vendor Name
Requested Service
Business Purpose
Business Owner
Requested Go-Live DateCreate a unique assessment identifier:
TPRA-YYYY-####Example:
TPRA-2026-0042Step 1.2 — Open Vendor Assessment Record
Section titled “Step 1.2 — Open Vendor Assessment Record”Create:
Vendor Assessment RecordRecord:
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Assessment ID | |
| Vendor | |
| Service | |
| Business Owner | |
| Request Date | |
| Requested Go-Live | |
| Analyst | |
| Status | Intake |
Step 1.3 — Verify Business Need
Section titled “Step 1.3 — Verify Business Need”Ask:
Why Is the Vendor Needed?
What Business ProcessDoes It Support?
Who Will Use It?
Is an ApprovedAlternative Available?Document the justification.
Decision Point
Section titled “Decision Point”If there is:
No ValidBusiness Owneror:
No ValidBusiness Needset status:
ON HOLDand return the request for clarification.
Phase 2 — Understand Vendor Exposure
Section titled “Phase 2 — Understand Vendor Exposure”Step 2.1 — Identify Data
Section titled “Step 2.1 — Identify Data”Determine whether vendor will process:
Public Data
Internal Data
Confidential Data
Personal Data
Sensitive Personal Data
Payment Data
Authentication Data
Financial Data
Intellectual Property
Security DataStep 2.2 — Identify System Access
Section titled “Step 2.2 — Identify System Access”Determine:
No Access
Application Access
API Access
Network Access
Cloud Access
Production Access
Privileged AccessStep 2.3 — Identify Integration
Section titled “Step 2.3 — Identify Integration”Document:
SSO
API
VPN
Database
Cloud Role
Agent
Webhook
File Transfer
Remote SupportStep 2.4 — Identify Data Locations
Section titled “Step 2.4 — Identify Data Locations”Ask:
Where Is Data Stored?
Where Is It Processed?
Where Are Backups?
Where Can SupportPersonnel Access It?Step 2.5 — Identify Subprocessors
Section titled “Step 2.5 — Identify Subprocessors”Request:
Vendor Subprocessor ListDocument critical:
Cloud Providers
Hosting Providers
Support Providers
Model Providers
Payment ProvidersPhase 3 — Perform Inherent Risk Assessment
Section titled “Phase 3 — Perform Inherent Risk Assessment”Step 3.1 — Score Data Sensitivity
Section titled “Step 3.1 — Score Data Sensitivity”Example:
| Exposure | Score |
|---|---|
| Public | 1 |
| Internal | 2 |
| Confidential | 3 |
| Restricted / Regulated | 4 |
Step 3.2 — Score Access
Section titled “Step 3.2 — Score Access”| Access | Score |
|---|---|
| None | 1 |
| Standard User | 2 |
| Production / API | 3 |
| Privileged | 4 |
Step 3.3 — Score Business Criticality
Section titled “Step 3.3 — Score Business Criticality”| Criticality | Score |
|---|---|
| Low | 1 |
| Medium | 2 |
| High | 3 |
| Critical | 4 |
Step 3.4 — Score Regulatory Exposure
Section titled “Step 3.4 — Score Regulatory Exposure”| Exposure | Score |
|---|---|
| Minimal | 1 |
| Limited | 2 |
| Significant | 3 |
| Regulated / Critical | 4 |
Step 3.5 — Score Operational Dependency
Section titled “Step 3.5 — Score Operational Dependency”| Dependency | Score |
|---|---|
| Easily Replaceable | 1 |
| Limited Dependency | 2 |
| Important | 3 |
| Essential | 4 |
Step 3.6 — Calculate Inherent Risk
Section titled “Step 3.6 — Calculate Inherent Risk”Example:
Data 4Access 3Criticality 4Regulatory 4Dependency 4 ──Total 19Example thresholds:
| Score | Risk |
|---|---|
| 5–8 | Low |
| 9–12 | Medium |
| 13–16 | High |
| 17–20 | Critical |
Phase 4 — Assign Vendor Tier
Section titled “Phase 4 — Assign Vendor Tier”Use:
| Inherent Risk | Tier |
|---|---|
| Critical | Tier 1 |
| High | Tier 2 |
| Medium | Tier 3 |
| Low | Tier 4 |
Record:
Vendor Tierin the assessment record.
Phase 5 — Determine Assessment Scope
Section titled “Phase 5 — Determine Assessment Scope”Tier 1
Section titled “Tier 1”Require:
Detailed Security Assessment
Privacy Assessment
Compliance Review
BCP / DR Review
Independent Assurance
Pen-Test Evidence
Contract Security Review
Continuous MonitoringTier 2
Section titled “Tier 2”Require:
Detailed Questionnaire
Security Evidence
Privacy Review if Applicable
Compliance Review
Resilience Review
Annual ReassessmentTier 3
Section titled “Tier 3”Require:
Standard Questionnaire
Risk-Based Evidence
Privacy Review if ApplicableTier 4
Section titled “Tier 4”Require:
Basic ScreeningPhase 6 — Issue Vendor Questionnaire
Section titled “Phase 6 — Issue Vendor Questionnaire”Send applicable modules:
Core Security
Privacy
Cloud
SaaS
Software
Resilience
AIRecord:
Sent Date
Vendor Due Date
Response DateEscalation
Section titled “Escalation”If questionnaire is overdue:
Day 7Reminder
Day 14Business Owner Reminder
Day 21Escalate to ProcurementAdjust to organizational SLA.
Phase 7 — Request Evidence
Section titled “Phase 7 — Request Evidence”Core Evidence
Section titled “Core Evidence”Request as applicable:
SOC 2
ISO 27001 Certificate
Security Policies
Penetration-Test Summary
Vulnerability Management Evidence
Incident Response Plan
BCP / DR Evidence
Privacy Documentation
Subprocessor ListAI Vendor Evidence
Section titled “AI Vendor Evidence”Also request:
AI Data Processing Terms
Model Provider Information
Training Policy
Prompt Retention
AI Subprocessor List
Deletion CapabilitiesPhase 8 — Validate Evidence
Section titled “Phase 8 — Validate Evidence”For every artifact verify:
Current?
Correct Vendor?
Correct Legal Entity?
Correct Service?
Correct Scope?
Valid Period?
Exceptions?
Independent?Do not record:
SOC 2 Receivedwithout also determining:
SOC 2 ReviewedPhase 9 — Review SOC Reports
Section titled “Phase 9 — Review SOC Reports”Check:
Type I / Type II
Audit Period
Scope
Opinion
Exceptions
Subservice Organizations
CUECsEscalate if:
Section titled “Escalate if:”Qualified Opinion
Repeated Critical Exceptions
Relevant Scope Excluded
Report ExpiredPhase 10 — Review ISO Evidence
Section titled “Phase 10 — Review ISO Evidence”Validate:
Certificate Number
Legal Entity
Scope
Locations
Issue Date
Expiry
Certification BodyDo not treat:
ISO Certifiedas sufficient without validating scope.
Phase 11 — Assess Identity & Access
Section titled “Phase 11 — Assess Identity & Access”Verify:
MFA
SSO
Least Privilege
RBAC
PAM
Access Reviews
Joiner / Mover / Leaver
Service AccountsCritical Finding Trigger
Section titled “Critical Finding Trigger”Escalate if:
Privileged Production AccessWithout MFAor:
Shared AdministrativeAccountswithout appropriate controls.
Phase 12 — Assess Encryption
Section titled “Phase 12 — Assess Encryption”Review:
Data at Rest
Data in Transit
Backups
Key Management
Key RotationDetermine whether controls align with:
Data ClassificationPhase 13 — Assess Vulnerability Management
Section titled “Phase 13 — Assess Vulnerability Management”Review:
Scanning Frequency
Patch SLA
Critical Vulnerability Handling
Exception Process
RetestingCritical Trigger
Section titled “Critical Trigger”If vendor has:
Known CriticalExploited Vulnerabilitydetermine whether production onboarding should be blocked.
Phase 14 — Assess Penetration Testing
Section titled “Phase 14 — Assess Penetration Testing”Verify:
Test Date
Scope
Independence
Critical Findings
High Findings
Remediation
RetestingFinding
Section titled “Finding”Do not treat:
Pen Test Completedas sufficient if:
Critical FindingsRemain OpenPhase 15 — Assess Secure Development
Section titled “Phase 15 — Assess Secure Development”For software vendors review:
Secure SDLC
Code Review
SAST
DAST
SCA
Dependency Management
Secrets Scanning
Threat Modeling
SBOM
Artifact IntegrityPhase 16 — Assess Logging & Monitoring
Section titled “Phase 16 — Assess Logging & Monitoring”Review:
Authentication Logging
Administrative Logging
Security Events
Data Access
Log Retention
Monitoring
SOC / SIEMPhase 17 — Assess Incident Response
Section titled “Phase 17 — Assess Incident Response”Review:
Incident Response Plan
Testing
Customer Notification
Escalation
Forensics
Root Cause AnalysisCompare vendor capability with contractual requirements.
Phase 18 — Perform Privacy Review
Section titled “Phase 18 — Perform Privacy Review”If personal data is processed, assess:
Data Categories
Purpose
Location
Retention
Deletion
Subprocessors
International Transfers
Data Subject Rights
Incident NotificationPrivacy Escalation Triggers
Section titled “Privacy Escalation Triggers”Escalate:
Indefinite Retention
Unapproved Secondary Use
Unknown Subprocessors
Unapproved Cross-Border Processing
Inability to Delete DataPhase 19 — Assess AI Risk
Section titled “Phase 19 — Assess AI Risk”For AI vendors determine:
Which Model?
Which Provider?
Are Prompts Retained?
Are Outputs Retained?
Is Customer DataUsed for Training?
Are Files Usedfor Model Improvement?
Are Embeddings Stored?
Is Memory Persistent?
Can Data Be Deleted?AI Risk Trigger
Section titled “AI Risk Trigger”Escalate when:
Sensitive Enterprise Data +Provider Model Trainingwithout approved controls.
Phase 20 — Assess Compliance
Section titled “Phase 20 — Assess Compliance”Determine applicable:
SOC 1
SOC 2
ISO 27001
ISO 27017
ISO 27018
PCI DSS
Privacy Requirements
Industry RequirementsMap:
Requirement ↓Vendor Evidence ↓GapPhase 21 — Assess Business Continuity
Section titled “Phase 21 — Assess Business Continuity”Review:
BCP
DR
Backup
RTO
RPO
Failover
Recovery TestingCompare:
Business Requirementagainst:
Vendor CapabilityExample
Section titled “Example”Required RTO:4 Hours
Vendor RTO:24 HoursRecord:
Resilience FindingPhase 22 — Assess Fourth-Party Risk
Section titled “Phase 22 — Assess Fourth-Party Risk”Identify:
Critical Subprocessors
Cloud Providers
Model Providers
Hosting Dependencies
Network DependenciesAsk:
Could Failureof a Fourth PartyImpact Our Service?Phase 23 — Identify Concentration Risk
Section titled “Phase 23 — Identify Concentration Risk”Check whether multiple services rely on:
Same Vendor
Same Cloud Provider
Same Region
Same Model Provider
Same Payment ProviderRecord material dependencies.
Phase 24 — Create Findings
Section titled “Phase 24 — Create Findings”Each finding should include:
Condition
Criteria
Risk
Severity
Evidence
Required ActionExample:
Finding
Section titled “Finding”Vendor administratorsare not requiredto use MFA.Compromised credentialscould provide unauthorizedprivileged access.Severity
Section titled “Severity”HighRequired Action
Section titled “Required Action”Implement mandatory MFAfor privileged users.Phase 25 — Rate Finding Severity
Section titled “Phase 25 — Rate Finding Severity”Use:
Critical
High
Medium
LowConsider:
Likelihood
Impact
Data Sensitivity
Business Criticality
Exposure
Existing ControlsPhase 26 — Assess Control Effectiveness
Section titled “Phase 26 — Assess Control Effectiveness”Use:
Effective
Partially Effective
Ineffective
Not Implemented
Not ApplicableAssess both:
Design Effectivenessand:
Operating EffectivenessPhase 27 — Determine Residual Risk
Section titled “Phase 27 — Determine Residual Risk”Conceptually:
Inherent Risk ↓Vendor Controls ↓Control Effectiveness ↓Findings ↓Compensating Controls ↓Residual RiskUse:
Low
Medium
High
CriticalPhase 28 — Determine Risk Treatment
Section titled “Phase 28 — Determine Risk Treatment”Choose:
Avoid
Mitigate
Transfer
AcceptDo not use vendor.
Mitigate
Section titled “Mitigate”Require remediation or additional controls.
Transfer
Section titled “Transfer”Use contractual allocation or insurance where appropriate.
Accept
Section titled “Accept”Obtain formal authorization.
Phase 29 — Define Compensating Controls
Section titled “Phase 29 — Define Compensating Controls”If vendor cannot immediately remediate, possible controls include:
Data Minimization
Restricted Access
IP Allowlisting
Additional Monitoring
Tokenization
Customer-Side Encryption
No Sensitive Data
Limited PilotEnsure compensating controls address the actual risk.
Phase 30 — Determine Approval Decision
Section titled “Phase 30 — Determine Approval Decision”Available outcomes:
APPROVED
APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS
REMEDIATION REQUIRED
ESCALATED
REJECTEDApproval Criteria — Approved
Section titled “Approval Criteria — Approved”Use when:
Residual RiskWithin Toleranceand no blocking issues remain.
Approval Criteria — Approved With Conditions
Section titled “Approval Criteria — Approved With Conditions”Use when:
Risk Acceptablefor Limited Operationprovided defined remediation is completed.
Approval Criteria — Remediation Required
Section titled “Approval Criteria — Remediation Required”Use when:
Material RiskMust Be ReducedBefore ProductionApproval Criteria — Escalated
Section titled “Approval Criteria — Escalated”Use when:
Risk ExceedsAnalyst AuthorityApproval Criteria — Rejected
Section titled “Approval Criteria — Rejected”Use when:
Risk Cannot BeReduced toAcceptable LevelPhase 31 — Obtain Risk Acceptance
Section titled “Phase 31 — Obtain Risk Acceptance”For unresolved risks, create:
Risk Acceptance RecordDocument:
Risk
Business Justification
Compensating Controls
Residual Risk
Owner
Approver
ExpiryRisk acceptance must be:
Authorized+Time-Bound+ReviewablePhase 32 — Translate Findings Into Contract Requirements
Section titled “Phase 32 — Translate Findings Into Contract Requirements”Send required items to:
Procurement
LegalExamples:
Incident Notification
Data Deletion
Subprocessor Notification
Audit Rights
MFA Requirements
Security Testing
BCP / DR
Data Location
AI Training RestrictionPhase 33 — Review Contract Security Terms
Section titled “Phase 33 — Review Contract Security Terms”Confirm relevant:
Security Addendum
DPA
SLA
Audit Rights
Incident Terms
Retention
Deletion
Subprocessors
Terminationare addressed.
Phase 34 — Record Contract Exceptions
Section titled “Phase 34 — Record Contract Exceptions”If vendor rejects a required clause:
Contract Requirement ↓Vendor Exception ↓Risk Assessment ↓ApprovalDo not silently remove the requirement.
Phase 35 — Pre-Onboarding Security Gate
Section titled “Phase 35 — Pre-Onboarding Security Gate”Before onboarding verify:
Assessment Complete?
Approval Complete?
Contract Complete?
Blocking Findings Resolved?
Risk Acceptance Approved?
Access Requirements Defined?If any mandatory item is:
Nohold onboarding.
Phase 36 — Third-Party Access Review
Section titled “Phase 36 — Third-Party Access Review”If vendor requires internal access, determine:
Named Accounts
Business Approval
Least Privilege
MFA
PAM
JIT
Expiry
LoggingPhase 37 — Service Account Review
Section titled “Phase 37 — Service Account Review”For integrations verify:
Account Owner
Purpose
Least Privilege
Secret Storage
Rotation
Expiration
MonitoringPhase 38 — API Access Review
Section titled “Phase 38 — API Access Review”Check:
API Authentication
Token Scope
Credential Storage
Rotation
Logging
Rate LimitingPhase 39 — Network Access Review
Section titled “Phase 39 — Network Access Review”For VPN / network access:
Vendor ↓Restricted Segment ↓Required SystemAvoid:
Vendor ↓Entire Internal NetworkPhase 40 — Secure Onboarding Checklist
Section titled “Phase 40 — Secure Onboarding Checklist”Create:
Vendor Onboarding ChecklistVerify:
-
named vendor identities created.
-
MFA enabled.
-
least privilege applied.
-
access expiry configured.
-
PAM used where required.
-
service accounts documented.
-
API credentials protected.
-
network access restricted.
-
audit logs enabled.
-
vendor owner confirmed.
Phase 41 — Data Onboarding Controls
Section titled “Phase 41 — Data Onboarding Controls”Before sending production data verify:
Data Approved?
Minimum Necessary?
Encryption?
Region Approved?
Retention Defined?
DPA Executed?Phase 42 — AI Onboarding Controls
Section titled “Phase 42 — AI Onboarding Controls”For AI vendors verify:
Approved Use Cases
Permitted Data
Training Disabledwhere Required
Retention Configured
Model Provider Approved
Subprocessors Reviewed
Sensitive Data Restrictions
Logging EnabledPhase 43 — Document Final Approval
Section titled “Phase 43 — Document Final Approval”Create:
Vendor Approval RecordInclude:
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Vendor | |
| Service | |
| Tier | |
| Inherent Risk | |
| Residual Risk | |
| Open Findings | |
| Decision | |
| Conditions | |
| Risk Owner | |
| Approval Date | |
| Next Review |
Phase 44 — Update Vendor Risk Register
Section titled “Phase 44 — Update Vendor Risk Register”Add:
Vendor
Business Owner
Service
Tier
Inherent Risk
Residual Risk
Findings
Risk Acceptance
Decision
Monitoring
Next ReviewPhase 45 — Define Monitoring Requirements
Section titled “Phase 45 — Define Monitoring Requirements”Use risk tier.
Tier 1
Section titled “Tier 1”Continuous Monitoring
Quarterly Governance Review
Annual Assessment
Annual SOC Review
Pen-Test Review
Incident Monitoring
Critical Vulnerability MonitoringTier 2
Section titled “Tier 2”Quarterly / Annual Monitoring
Annual Assessment
Evidence Review
Finding MonitoringTier 3
Section titled “Tier 3”Annual / Event-Based ReviewTier 4
Section titled “Tier 4”Renewal / Event-Driven ReviewPhase 46 — Define Reassessment Triggers
Section titled “Phase 46 — Define Reassessment Triggers”Trigger reassessment after:
Security Breach
Major Outage
New Data Type
New Production Access
New Privileged Access
New Country
New Subprocessor
AI Feature Change
Acquisition
Certification Loss
Critical VulnerabilityPhase 47 — Define Vendor Finding Monitoring
Section titled “Phase 47 — Define Vendor Finding Monitoring”For each finding track:
Owner
Due Date
Severity
Status
Evidence
RetestPhase 48 — Escalate Overdue Findings
Section titled “Phase 48 — Escalate Overdue Findings”Example:
High Finding ↓Past Due ↓Vendor Owner ↓TPRM ↓Risk Committeebased on defined thresholds.
Phase 49 — Monitor Risk Acceptance Expiry
Section titled “Phase 49 — Monitor Risk Acceptance Expiry”Before expiry:
30 Days ↓Reminderthen determine:
Remediated?
Renew Acceptance?
Escalate?
Stop Service?Phase 50 — Monitor Vendor Incidents
Section titled “Phase 50 — Monitor Vendor Incidents”If vendor reports an incident:
Open Vendor Incident RecordAssess:
Our Data?
Our Systems?
Our Users?
Our Operations?
Regulatory Impact?
Contract SLA?Phase 51 — Vendor Incident Reassessment
Section titled “Phase 51 — Vendor Incident Reassessment”If material:
Vendor Incident ↓Trigger Reassessment ↓Update Residual RiskPhase 52 — Monitor Assurance Expiry
Section titled “Phase 52 — Monitor Assurance Expiry”Track:
SOC Reports
ISO Certificates
Pen Tests
Insurance
BCP TestsSet alerts before expiry.
Phase 53 — Review Vendor at Renewal
Section titled “Phase 53 — Review Vendor at Renewal”Before renewal reassess:
Current Risk
Open Findings
Incidents
SLA
Evidence
Subprocessors
Service Changes
Contract ExceptionsPhase 54 — Secure Vendor Termination
Section titled “Phase 54 — Secure Vendor Termination”If vendor relationship ends:
Contract End ↓Access Removal ↓Token Revocation ↓Data Return ↓Data Deletion ↓EvidencePhase 55 — Offboarding Checklist
Section titled “Phase 55 — Offboarding Checklist”Verify:
-
user accounts disabled.
-
privileged accounts disabled.
-
VPN removed.
-
API keys revoked.
-
service accounts disabled.
-
tokens revoked.
-
certificates revoked.
-
integrations removed.
-
data returned.
-
data deleted.
-
deletion evidence retained.
Escalation Conditions
Section titled “Escalation Conditions”Immediately escalate when:
Critical Residual Risk
Confirmed Vendor Breach
Unresolved Critical Finding
Privileged Access Without MFA
Material Data Residency Issue
Vendor Refuses Required Security Terms
Critical Certification Loss
Major Resilience Failure
Unapproved High-Risk SubprocessorEscalation Path
Section titled “Escalation Path”TPRM Analyst ↓TPRM Manager / GRC ↓Cybersecurity / Privacy ↓Business Risk Owner ↓Risk Committee ↓Executive ManagementVendor Assessment Status Values
Section titled “Vendor Assessment Status Values”Use standardized statuses:
Requested
Intake
Risk Tiering
Assessment
Waiting for Vendor
Evidence Review
Remediation
Risk Approval
Contract Review
Onboarding
Approved
Rejected
Monitoring
TerminatedEvidence Requirements
Section titled “Evidence Requirements”Retain:
Vendor Intake
Inherent Risk Assessment
Questionnaire
SOC Reports
ISO Certificates
Pen-Test Evidence
Privacy Evidence
BCP / DR Evidence
Findings
Risk Treatment
Risk Acceptance
Approval
Contracts
Onboarding Evidence
Monitoring RecordsRecommended Evidence Folder
Section titled “Recommended Evidence Folder”TPRA-2026-0042/│├── 01 Intake/├── 02 Inherent Risk/├── 03 Questionnaire/├── 04 Security Evidence/├── 05 Privacy Evidence/├── 06 Compliance Evidence/├── 07 Resilience/├── 08 Findings/├── 09 Remediation/├── 10 Risk Acceptance/├── 11 Contract/├── 12 Approval/├── 13 Onboarding/└── 14 Monitoring/Operational Metrics
Section titled “Operational Metrics”Track:
Assessment Completion Time
Vendors Assessed Before Onboarding
Evidence Completion
Critical Findings
Overdue Findings
Risk Acceptance
Assessment Coverage
Monitoring CoverageKPI — Pre-Onboarding Assessment
Section titled “KPI — Pre-Onboarding Assessment”Vendors AssessedBefore Production──────────────── × 100New VendorsTarget:
100%KPI — Assessment SLA
Section titled “KPI — Assessment SLA”Assessments CompletedWithin SLA──────────────────── × 100Assessments CompletedKPI — Critical Evidence Coverage
Section titled “KPI — Critical Evidence Coverage”Required CriticalEvidence Received──────────────── × 100Critical Evidence RequiredKRI — Critical Vendor Without Assessment
Section titled “KRI — Critical Vendor Without Assessment”Critical VendorsOperating WithoutCurrent AssessmentTarget:
0KRI — Open Critical Findings
Section titled “KRI — Open Critical Findings”Open CriticalVendor FindingsTarget:
0KRI — Expired Risk Acceptance
Section titled “KRI — Expired Risk Acceptance”Vendor RisksOperating PastApproved ExpiryTarget:
0Common Failure Scenarios
Section titled “Common Failure Scenarios”Scenario 1 — Business Already Purchased Vendor
Section titled “Scenario 1 — Business Already Purchased Vendor”Do not skip risk assessment.
Perform:
Emergency Intake ↓Risk Assessment ↓Control Restrictions ↓Formal Decisionand document process failure.
Scenario 2 — Vendor Refuses Questionnaire
Section titled “Scenario 2 — Vendor Refuses Questionnaire”Seek alternative assurance:
SOC Report
ISO Evidence
Security Portal
Independent Audit
Controlled Evidence ReviewIf assurance remains insufficient:
Record Assurance Gap ↓Increase Residual RiskScenario 3 — Vendor Will Not Provide Pen Test
Section titled “Scenario 3 — Vendor Will Not Provide Pen Test”Assess whether:
SOC 2
Independent Security Audit
Certification
Alternative Evidenceprovides adequate assurance.
If not:
Risk Exceptionmay be required.
Scenario 4 — Business Demands Immediate Go-Live
Section titled “Scenario 4 — Business Demands Immediate Go-Live”Use:
Documented Risk
Restricted Scope
Compensating Controls
Temporary Approval
Defined Expiryonly where appropriate and authorized.
Scenario 5 — Critical Finding Discovered
Section titled “Scenario 5 — Critical Finding Discovered”Do not automatically continue onboarding.
Determine:
Can It Be RemediatedBefore Production?If no:
Can Risk BeAcceptably Compensated?If no:
Escalate / RejectScenario 6 — Vendor Adds AI Feature
Section titled “Scenario 6 — Vendor Adds AI Feature”Trigger:
AI Risk Reviewbefore sensitive enterprise data is used.
Scenario 7 — New Subprocessor Identified
Section titled “Scenario 7 — New Subprocessor Identified”Review:
Service
Data
Location
Security
Privacy
Contract RightsDecision Tree
Section titled “Decision Tree”Vendor Requested ↓Business Need Valid? │ ├── No → Stop │ └── Yes ↓ Inherent Risk ↓ Risk Tier ↓ Required Assessment ↓ Evidence Complete? │ ├── No → Obtain / Escalate │ └── Yes ↓ Critical Finding? │ ┌──────┴──────┐ Yes No ↓ ↓ Can Remediate? Residual Risk │ ↓ ┌───┴───┐ Within Appetite? Yes No │ ↓ ↓ ┌───┴───┐Remediate Compensate? Yes No │ ↓ ↓ ┌───┴───┐ Approve Escalate Yes No ↓ ↓ Accept? RejectRunbook Completion Checklist
Section titled “Runbook Completion Checklist”Intake
Section titled “Intake”-
assessment record created.
-
business owner confirmed.
-
service documented.
-
business need validated.
-
go-live date captured.
Risk Identification
Section titled “Risk Identification”-
data identified.
-
access identified.
-
integrations documented.
-
criticality determined.
-
regulatory exposure assessed.
-
fourth parties identified.
Inherent Risk
Section titled “Inherent Risk”-
risk factors scored.
-
inherent risk calculated.
-
vendor tier assigned.
-
assessment scope determined.
Due Diligence
Section titled “Due Diligence”-
questionnaire completed.
-
evidence received.
-
evidence current.
-
evidence scope validated.
-
SOC/ISO reviewed where applicable.
-
pen-test evidence reviewed.
Security
Section titled “Security”-
IAM reviewed.
-
MFA reviewed.
-
privileged access reviewed.
-
encryption reviewed.
-
vulnerability management reviewed.
-
secure development reviewed.
-
logging reviewed.
-
incident response reviewed.
Privacy
Section titled “Privacy”-
personal data identified.
-
purpose reviewed.
-
data location reviewed.
-
retention reviewed.
-
deletion reviewed.
-
subprocessors reviewed.
-
cross-border processing reviewed.
Resilience
Section titled “Resilience”-
BCP reviewed.
-
DR reviewed.
-
RTO compared.
-
RPO compared.
-
backup assessed.
-
recovery testing reviewed.
-
model provider identified.
-
training use reviewed.
-
prompt retention reviewed.
-
outputs reviewed.
-
embeddings reviewed.
-
AI memory reviewed.
-
subprocessors reviewed.
-
deletion reviewed.
Findings
Section titled “Findings”-
findings documented.
-
severity assigned.
-
remediation defined.
-
owner assigned.
-
due date assigned.
Residual Risk
Section titled “Residual Risk”-
control effectiveness evaluated.
-
compensating controls considered.
-
residual risk determined.
-
risk appetite checked.
Approval
Section titled “Approval”-
decision documented.
-
conditions documented.
-
authorized approval obtained.
-
risk acceptance documented where applicable.
Contracts
Section titled “Contracts”-
security requirements mapped.
-
privacy terms reviewed.
-
incident terms reviewed.
-
audit rights reviewed.
-
subprocessor requirements reviewed.
-
retention/deletion reviewed.
-
exceptions documented.
Onboarding
Section titled “Onboarding”-
access requirements approved.
-
MFA enabled.
-
least privilege applied.
-
service accounts governed.
-
API credentials governed.
-
network access restricted.
-
logging enabled.
Monitoring
Section titled “Monitoring”-
monitoring frequency established.
-
reassessment date assigned.
-
material-change triggers defined.
-
finding monitoring established.
-
evidence expiry tracked.
-
risk-acceptance expiry tracked.
Runbook Output
Section titled “Runbook Output”At completion, the analyst should produce:
Vendor Assessment Record
Inherent Risk Assessment
Vendor Tier
Due Diligence Evidence Pack
Vendor Findings Register
Residual Risk Assessment
Risk Treatment Plan
Risk Acceptance Record
Contract Requirements
Vendor Approval Record
Onboarding Checklist
Monitoring PlanExpected Outcome
Section titled “Expected Outcome”A successfully completed runbook should allow the organization to answer:
Why Are WeUsing This Vendor?
What DataDo They Process?
What AccessDo They Have?
How CriticalAre They?
What Is TheirInherent Risk?
What ControlsDo They Have?
What EvidenceSupports Those Controls?
What FindingsRemain?
What Is theResidual Risk?
What MustBe Remediated?
Who AcceptedAny Remaining Risk?
What ContractControls Apply?
Was OnboardingPerformed Securely?
How Will WeMonitor Them?
When Will WeReassess Them?Runbook Success Criteria
Section titled “Runbook Success Criteria”The runbook is successful when:
No Third PartyEnters ProductionWithout AppropriateRisk Evaluationand every material vendor has:
Owner+Risk Tier+Assessment+Evidence+Decision+MonitoringWhat’s Next?
Section titled “What’s Next?”➡️ Next: Runbook 02 — Third-Party Risk Monitoring, Incident Escalation & Vendor Offboarding
In the next runbook, you will move from initial vendor assessment and onboarding to operating the vendor relationship throughout its lifecycle.
You will work through:
Approved Vendor ↓Continuous Monitoring ↓Risk Signals ↓Vendor Incident ↓Material Change ↓Reassessment ↓Finding / Remediation ↓Risk Escalation ↓Contract Renewal ↓Vendor Exit ↓Access Revocation ↓Data Return & DeletionThe runbook will provide an operational process for continuous vendor monitoring, security-incident handling, risk-trigger validation, event-driven reassessment, finding escalation, risk-acceptance review, contract renewal, vendor termination, access revocation, data deletion, and evidence-based closure.