03 PCI Scope
Accurate PCI DSS scope is one of the most important foundations of a PCI program.
If scope is wrong, everything that follows can be wrong:
Control Requirements
Evidence Collection
Security Testing
Assessment Coverage
Third-Party Responsibilities
Compliance StatusA strong PCI scoping process answers:
Which systems, people, processes, locations, technologies, and service providers must be considered when applying PCI DSS requirements?
The practical scoping lifecycle looks like:
Payment Channels ↓Cardholder Data Flows ↓CDE ↓Connected Systems ↓Security-Impacting Systems ↓Segmentation Systems ↓People & Processes ↓Third Parties ↓Scope Exclusions ↓Technical Validation ↓PCI Scope StatementLearning Objectives
Section titled “Learning Objectives”By the end of this lesson, you will be able to:
-
Explain PCI DSS scope.
-
Distinguish CDE scope from broader PCI scope.
-
Classify systems according to PCI relevance.
-
Identify connected-to systems.
-
Identify security-impacting systems.
-
Identify segmentation systems.
-
Identify administrative systems.
-
Understand cloud management-plane scope.
-
Understand CI/CD and software-delivery scope.
-
Understand third-party dependencies.
-
Include people and processes in scope.
-
Determine whether systems can be reasonably excluded.
-
Understand scope reduction.
-
Validate segmentation claims.
-
Identify scope-expansion triggers.
-
Build a PCI Scope Statement.
-
Build an In-Scope Asset Register.
-
Build a Scope Exclusion Register.
-
Build a Third-Party Responsibility Matrix.
-
Perform annual PCI scope validation.
1. What Is PCI Scope?
Section titled “1. What Is PCI Scope?”PCI scope defines the environment to which applicable PCI DSS requirements must be considered.
At a high level:
PCI Scope=CDE+Systems That Can Affect CDE Security+Relevant People+Relevant Processes+Relevant Third PartiesThe CDE is central, but it is not always the entire scope.
2. Why Scope Matters
Section titled “2. Why Scope Matters”Consider two organizations.
Organization A:
Entire Enterprise NetworkConnected to Payment SystemsOrganization B:
Dedicated Payment Network ↓Strong Segmentation ↓Limited Admin AccessOrganization B may have a much smaller and more manageable PCI scope.
3. Scope Is an Architecture Problem
Section titled “3. Scope Is an Architecture Problem”Weak PCI programs treat scope as:
Compliance Spreadsheet ExerciseStrong programs treat scope as:
Architecture+Data Flow+Connectivity+Access+Security Dependencies4. Start From the CDE
Section titled “4. Start From the CDE”You should already know the main CDE components:
Systems Storing CHD
Systems Processing CHD
Systems Transmitting CHDThese are the starting point.
5. Scope Extends Beyond Direct CHD Systems
Section titled “5. Scope Extends Beyond Direct CHD Systems”Ask:
What Can Connect To the CDE?
What Can Administer the CDE?
What Can Change the CDE?
What Protects the CDE?
What Monitors the CDE?These questions reveal additional systems.
6. Practical PCI System Categories
Section titled “6. Practical PCI System Categories”For this learning path, use the following classification model:
CDE
Connected-to
Security-Impacting
Segmentation
Third-Party Dependency
Potentially Out of Scope7. Category 1 — CDE Systems
Section titled “7. Category 1 — CDE Systems”These directly:
Store
Process
Transmitapplicable cardholder data.
Examples:
Payment Application
Payment Database
Checkout API
Payment Gateway Connector8. CDE Example
Section titled “8. CDE Example”PAY-WEB-01→ Processes PANClassification:
CDE9. Payment Database Example
Section titled “9. Payment Database Example”PAY-DB-01→ Stores Encrypted PANClassification:
CDEEncryption does not remove the system from scope.
10. Category 2 — Connected-to Systems
Section titled “10. Category 2 — Connected-to Systems”These may not directly process PAN but can connect to CDE systems.
Examples:
Jump Hosts
Admin Networks
Management Servers
Backup Servers
Monitoring Servers11. Connected-to Example
Section titled “11. Connected-to Example”JUMP-01 ↓SSH ↓PAY-APP-01Classification:
Connected-to12. Why Connected-to Systems Matter
Section titled “12. Why Connected-to Systems Matter”A compromised connected system may become a path into the CDE.
Example:
Compromised Admin Workstation ↓Jump Host ↓Payment Server13. Category 3 — Security-Impacting Systems
Section titled “13. Category 3 — Security-Impacting Systems”These provide controls that protect the CDE.
Examples:
Identity Provider
SIEM
EDR Platform
Vulnerability Scanner
Secrets Manager
PKI
NTP
DNS14. Identity Provider Example
Section titled “14. Identity Provider Example”If CDE administrators authenticate through:
Enterprise Identity Providerthen compromise of the identity platform may compromise CDE access.
Classification:
Security-Impacting15. SIEM Example
Section titled “15. SIEM Example”If PCI logging requirements depend on:
Central SIEMthen the SIEM is part of the security control chain.
16. Vulnerability Scanner Example
Section titled “16. Vulnerability Scanner Example”If PCI vulnerability scanning depends on:
Enterprise Vulnerability Scannerthen configuration and access to that platform matter.
17. Secrets Management Example
Section titled “17. Secrets Management Example”If payment applications retrieve:
Database Passwords
API Keys
Certificatesfrom a secrets platform:
Secrets Platform→ Security-Impacting18. Category 4 — Segmentation Systems
Section titled “18. Category 4 — Segmentation Systems”These enforce boundaries between:
CDEand:
Non-CDE EnvironmentExamples:
Firewall
Cloud Security Group
Network ACL
Microsegmentation Platform
ZTNA Policy19. Segmentation System Example
Section titled “19. Segmentation System Example”Corporate Network ↓Firewall ↓CDEThe firewall is a critical PCI-scoping component because the scope-reduction claim depends on it.
20. Why Segmentation Systems Need Attention
Section titled “20. Why Segmentation Systems Need Attention”If the segmentation control fails:
Out-of-Scope Environment ↓Potentially Becomes In ScopeTherefore segmentation is not just a convenience—it is a scope-control mechanism.
21. Category 5 — Third-Party Dependencies
Section titled “21. Category 5 — Third-Party Dependencies”Third parties may:
Store CHD
Process CHD
Transmit CHD
Provide Security Services
Provide InfrastructureExamples:
Payment Gateway
Processor
Cloud Provider
Tokenization Provider
Managed Security Provider22. Provider Scope Example
Section titled “22. Provider Scope Example”Merchant Website ↓Payment Gateway ↓ProcessorThe merchant should document each provider and its responsibility.
23. Category 6 — Potentially Out-of-Scope Systems
Section titled “23. Category 6 — Potentially Out-of-Scope Systems”A system may be excluded when there is a defensible basis.
Example:
HR SaaSmay be out of scope if it:
Does Not Store CHD
Does Not Connect to CDE
Cannot Affect CDE Security24. Out-of-Scope Does Not Mean Ignored
Section titled “24. Out-of-Scope Does Not Mean Ignored”You should still document:
Why It Is Out of Scopebecause assessors may ask.
25. Build PCI Scope Matrix
Section titled “25. Build PCI Scope Matrix”Create:
01 PCI Scope MatrixUse:
| System | Classification | CHD Role | Connectivity | Reason |
|---|
26. Example PCI Scope Matrix
Section titled “26. Example PCI Scope Matrix”| System | Classification | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| PAY-WEB-01 | CDE | Processes PAN |
| PAY-DB-01 | CDE | Stores PAN |
| JUMP-01 | Connected-to | Admin access to CDE |
| ENTRA-ID | Security-Impacting | Authenticates CDE admins |
| FW-CDE-01 | Segmentation | Separates CDE |
| HR-SAAS | Out of Scope | No connectivity or impact |
27. Administrative Systems
Section titled “27. Administrative Systems”Administrative access is one of the most important scope paths.
Document:
Administrator ↓Endpoint ↓VPN / ZTNA ↓Jump Host ↓CDEEvery layer should be analyzed.
28. Administrator Endpoint
Section titled “28. Administrator Endpoint”Ask:
Can this endpoint directly administer CDE systems?If yes, scope analysis is required.
29. Privileged Access Workstations
Section titled “29. Privileged Access Workstations”Using:
Dedicated Privileged Workstationscan make scope boundaries easier to defend.
Example:
Standard Laptop ✗ ↓CDE
Privileged Workstation ✓ ↓CDE30. VPN Systems
Section titled “30. VPN Systems”If VPN provides administrative access:
VPN→ Security-Impacting / Connected-todepending on architecture.
31. Zero Trust Access Platforms
Section titled “31. Zero Trust Access Platforms”Likewise:
ZTNA Gateway ↓CDEmay be part of the relevant control environment.
32. Cloud Management Plane
Section titled “32. Cloud Management Plane”Modern PCI scoping must include cloud-control-plane access.
Example:
AWS Organization ↓Production Account ↓Payment WorkloadsAsk:
Who Can Modify IAM?
Who Can Modify Networks?
Who Can Modify Payment Resources?33. Cloud Root / Management Accounts
Section titled “33. Cloud Root / Management Accounts”A cloud management account may not contain PAN but may be able to:
Create Admin Access
Change Logging
Disable Security Controls
Modify CDE AccountsThis can make it highly security relevant.
34. Cloud IAM
Section titled “34. Cloud IAM”Review:
Federation
Roles
Permission Boundaries
Cross-Account Access
Break-Glass Access35. Infrastructure as Code
Section titled “35. Infrastructure as Code”If payment infrastructure is deployed using:
Terraform
CloudFormation
Bicepthen repositories and pipelines may affect CDE security.
36. IaC Pipeline Example
Section titled “36. IaC Pipeline Example”Terraform Repo ↓CI/CD ↓CDE NetworkThe toolchain can change CDE security controls.
37. CI/CD Scope
Section titled “37. CI/CD Scope”Ask:
Can the pipeline deploy to the CDE?
Can it modify infrastructure?
Can it modify payment applications?If yes, it is security-impacting.
38. Repository Scope
Section titled “38. Repository Scope”A source repository may be relevant when it controls:
Payment Application Code
Infrastructure Code
Security Configuration39. Deployment Credentials
Section titled “39. Deployment Credentials”If CI/CD uses:
Production Cloud Credentialsthen those identities and secret-management processes are highly relevant.
40. Artifact Registries
Section titled “40. Artifact Registries”A container registry can affect CDE security if:
Registry Image ↓Production Payment Workload41. Kubernetes Environments
Section titled “41. Kubernetes Environments”If payment workloads run in Kubernetes:
Cluster
Control Plane
Worker Nodes
Ingress
Secrets
RBACmust be considered.
42. Kubernetes Administration
Section titled “42. Kubernetes Administration”Users with:
Cluster Admincan affect payment workloads even if they never access PAN directly.
43. Shared Kubernetes Cluster
Section titled “43. Shared Kubernetes Cluster”Suppose:
Payment Workloads
Non-Payment Workloadsshare one cluster.
This may create scope complexity.
Strong isolation needs to be demonstrated rather than assumed.
44. Shared Cloud Account
Section titled “44. Shared Cloud Account”Likewise:
Payment Resources
Corporate Resourceswithin one cloud account may expand the relevant environment.
Dedicated accounts can simplify scope.
45. Shared Identity Platform
Section titled “45. Shared Identity Platform”Many organizations use one enterprise identity service across:
Corporate Systems
CDE SystemsThat identity service may be part of PCI security scope even if most applications are non-PCI.
46. Monitoring Platforms
Section titled “46. Monitoring Platforms”If the same SIEM monitors:
Enterprise
CDEthe SIEM may be relevant, but that does not necessarily mean every monitored system is in PCI scope.
Scope should be reasoned carefully.
47. Backup Scope
Section titled “47. Backup Scope”If backup contains:
Encrypted PANthe backup environment is relevant.
Ask:
Where Are Backups Stored?
Who Can Restore Them?
Who Can Access Keys?
Which Region?48. DR Scope
Section titled “48. DR Scope”If payment systems replicate to:
Disaster Recovery Regionthe DR environment is part of the payment architecture.
49. Security Operations
Section titled “49. Security Operations”People and systems supporting:
Monitoring
Incident Response
Log Review
Vulnerability Managementcan be part of the PCI control environment.
50. Service Desk
Section titled “50. Service Desk”If the service desk can:
Reset CDE Admin Credentialsor:
Provision CDE Accessits processes may affect CDE security.
51. HR
Section titled “51. HR”HR systems may be out of technical PCI scope, but HR processes may support controls such as:
Termination
Background Checks
Security AwarenessPCI scope includes processes, not only systems.
52. People in Scope
Section titled “52. People in Scope”Identify:
CDE Users
CDE Administrators
Security Operators
Developers
Support Staff
Third-Party Administrators53. People Scope Register
Section titled “53. People Scope Register”Create:
02 PCI In-Scope Role RegisterUse:
| Role | CHD Access | CDE Admin | Security Impact | Owner |
|---|
54. Developer Scope
Section titled “54. Developer Scope”A developer may have:
No Production Loginbut can:
Commit Code ↓Payment ApplicationTheir development process can still affect payment security.
55. Support Scope
Section titled “55. Support Scope”Support personnel may enter scope if they:
View PAN
Handle Payment Calls
Access CDE Applications56. Vendor Personnel
Section titled “56. Vendor Personnel”Third-party administrators may:
Manage Payment Infrastructure
Support Payment ApplicationsTheir access should be documented.
57. Processes in Scope
Section titled “57. Processes in Scope”Include processes such as:
Payment Processing
Refunds
Access Management
Change Management
Incident Response
Vulnerability Management
Backup
Security Monitoring
Vendor Management58. Build Process Register
Section titled “58. Build Process Register”Create:
03 PCI In-Scope Process RegisterUse:
| Process | PCI Relevance | Owner | Systems |
|---|
59. Payment Data Flow Scope
Section titled “59. Payment Data Flow Scope”For each data flow ask:
Source?
Destination?
Data?
Protocol?
Provider?
Storage?60. Cross-Border Data Flow
Section titled “60. Cross-Border Data Flow”If payment data moves:
Region A ↓Region Bdocument:
Why
How
Which Provider
Which Systems61. Scope Reduction
Section titled “61. Scope Reduction”Scope reduction aims to minimize unnecessary exposure.
Common approaches:
Segmentation
Tokenization
Hosted Payment Pages
Data Elimination
Dedicated Systems
Privileged Access Zones62. Scope Reduction Principle
Section titled “62. Scope Reduction Principle”The best scope reduction strategy is often:
Do Not Handle PANUnless Necessary63. Hosted Payment Provider
Section titled “63. Hosted Payment Provider”Example:
Customer ↓Provider Payment Page ↓Merchant Receives TokenThis may significantly reduce merchant exposure.
64. Token-Only Systems
Section titled “64. Token-Only Systems”If a system uses tokens:
Token≠Automatically Out of ScopeAssess whether the token can be converted back to PAN and whether the system can affect the tokenization process.
65. PAN Elimination
Section titled “65. PAN Elimination”Example:
Support Platform Contains PANRemediation:
Remove PAN
Implement Filtering
Train Users
Monitor Future EntriesPotential result:
Reduced Scopeafter validation.
66. Segmentation-Based Scope Reduction
Section titled “66. Segmentation-Based Scope Reduction”Example:
Corporate Network ↓Firewall ↓CDEFor the corporate network to be treated separately, segmentation must be effective.
67. Segmentation Validation
Section titled “67. Segmentation Validation”Validate through:
Configuration Review
Firewall Rule Review
Penetration Testing
Connectivity Testing68. Segmentation Test Example
Section titled “68. Segmentation Test Example”Attempt:
Corporate Workstation ↓CDE DatabaseExpected:
No Connectivity69. Segmentation Failure
Section titled “69. Segmentation Failure”Actual:
TCP/1433 ReachableResult:
Segmentation FailurePotential consequence:
Scope Expansion70. Scope Expansion
Section titled “70. Scope Expansion”Scope expands when:
Unexpected Connectivity
Unexpected PAN Storage
New Provider
New Payment Channel
Security Dependency Added71. Example — New Log Platform
Section titled “71. Example — New Log Platform”Payment application logs are sent to:
New Analytics PlatformIf logs contain PAN:
Analytics Platform→ Potentially In Scope72. Example — New AI Provider
Section titled “72. Example — New AI Provider”Support ticket containing PAN is sent to:
AI ProviderNow review:
Data Flow
Provider PCI Status
Retention
Security
Scope73. Example — New SaaS Admin Platform
Section titled “73. Example — New SaaS Admin Platform”A SaaS identity platform now controls CDE administrator accounts.
It may become:
Security-Impacting74. Example — New Network Peering
Section titled “74. Example — New Network Peering”A new VPC peering connection links:
Corporate VPCto:
CDE VPCScope must be reassessed.
75. Significant Change Triggers
Section titled “75. Significant Change Triggers”Define triggers such as:
New Payment Application
New Provider
New Cloud Account
New Region
New Network Connection
New CI/CD Platform
New Authentication Platform
Acquisition76. Build Scope Change Trigger Register
Section titled “76. Build Scope Change Trigger Register”Create:
04 PCI Scope Change Trigger RegisterUse:
| Change | PCI Review Required | Owner |
|---|
77. Scope Exclusion
Section titled “77. Scope Exclusion”An exclusion should be documented rather than assumed.
Create:
05 PCI Scope Exclusion RegisterUse:
| System | Exclusion Reason | Validation | Owner |
|---|
78. Strong Exclusion Example
Section titled “78. Strong Exclusion Example”System:
HR-SaaSReason:
Does Not Process CHD
No CDE Connectivity
No Security DependencyValidation:
Architecture Review+Connectivity Review79. Weak Exclusion Example
Section titled “79. Weak Exclusion Example”This system belongs to HR, so it is out of scope.
Business ownership alone does not determine scope.
80. Scope Statement
Section titled “80. Scope Statement”A formal scope statement explains:
What Is Included
What Is Excluded
Why
Which Locations
Which Providers
Which Payment Channels81. Build PCI Scope Statement
Section titled “81. Build PCI Scope Statement”Create:
06 PCI Scope StatementRecommended sections:
Organization
Assessment Period
Payment Channels
CDE
Connected Systems
Security-Impacting Systems
Segmentation
Third Parties
People
Processes
Exclusions
Assumptions82. Example Scope Statement
Section titled “82. Example Scope Statement”The PCI DSS scope includes the e-commerce payment environment supporting the production checkout service, associated payment APIs, payment database, administrative jump hosts, identity services supporting CDE authentication, central security logging, vulnerability scanning, backup infrastructure, and network segmentation controls.
83. Scope Statement Exclusion Example
Section titled “83. Scope Statement Exclusion Example”Corporate HR and collaboration SaaS platforms are excluded because they do not store, process, or transmit account data, do not have connectivity to the CDE, and do not provide security services upon which the CDE depends.
84. Network Scope Map
Section titled “84. Network Scope Map”Create:
07 PCI Network Scope MapExample:
Internet │ ▼ WAF / Firewall │ ▼ Payment Web │ ┌───────┴───────┐ ▼ ▼ Payment API Payment DB │ ▼ Payment Processor
Corporate Network │ ✗ │Segmentation Firewall │ ▼Admin Zone │ ▼CDE85. In-Scope Asset Register
Section titled “85. In-Scope Asset Register”Create:
08 PCI In-Scope Asset RegisterUse:
| Asset | Classification | Owner | Environment | Reason |
|---|
86. Recommended Asset Fields
Section titled “86. Recommended Asset Fields”Include:
Hostname / Resource ID
Cloud Account
Environment
IP / Network
Owner
Data Role
Classification87. Third-Party Scope Register
Section titled “87. Third-Party Scope Register”Create:
09 PCI Third-Party Scope RegisterUse:
| Provider | Service | CHD Role | PCI Relevance | Assurance |
|---|
88. Provider Responsibility Matrix
Section titled “88. Provider Responsibility Matrix”Create:
10 PCI Third-Party Responsibility MatrixUse:
| Requirement Area | Organization | Provider | Shared |
|---|
89. Example Responsibility Mapping
Section titled “89. Example Responsibility Mapping”| Control | Merchant | Cloud Provider |
|---|---|---|
| Physical Data Center Security | — | ✓ |
| Cloud IAM | ✓ | — |
| Network Security Groups | ✓ | Shared |
| Hypervisor Security | — | ✓ |
90. Do Not Confuse Provider Compliance With Your Compliance
Section titled “90. Do Not Confuse Provider Compliance With Your Compliance”Cloud provider:
PCI DSS Validateddoes not mean:
Customer Workload=PCI CompliantCustomer responsibilities remain.
91. Provider AOC Review
Section titled “91. Provider AOC Review”For critical providers review:
Provider Name
Service
Assessment Period
Service Scope
Compliance Status92. Shared Responsibility Documentation
Section titled “92. Shared Responsibility Documentation”Especially in cloud:
Provider +Customer =Complete ControlMissing either side can create a gap.
93. Scope Validation Interviews
Section titled “93. Scope Validation Interviews”Interview:
Payment Product Owner
Network Team
Cloud Team
Application Team
Security
Finance
Support
Procurement94. Why Interviews Matter
Section titled “94. Why Interviews Matter”A diagram may say:
No PAN in Supportwhile support staff say:
Customers regularly send card numbers in tickets.That discrepancy must be investigated.
95. Technical Validation
Section titled “95. Technical Validation”Use technical sources such as:
Network Rules
Cloud Inventories
IAM Policies
Routing Tables
Asset Inventory
Data Discovery
Code Repositories96. Scope Assumption Validation
Section titled “96. Scope Assumption Validation”For every assumption ask:
What Evidence Supports It?Example:
Assumption:
Corporate Network Cannot Reach CDEEvidence:
Firewall Configuration
Segmentation Test97. Scope Findings
Section titled “97. Scope Findings”A scope finding should identify:
Condition
Impact
Affected System
Reason
Required Action98. Finding — Undocumented Database
Section titled “98. Finding — Undocumented Database”A secondary reporting database contains truncated and full PAN values but is absent from the PCI asset inventory.
Potential outcome:
PCI Scope Expansion99. Finding — Identity Dependency
Section titled “99. Finding — Identity Dependency”The identity provider authenticating payment administrators is not classified as a PCI security-impacting system.
100. Finding — Developer Pipeline
Section titled “100. Finding — Developer Pipeline”The deployment pipeline can modify the production payment application but is classified as out of scope.
101. Finding — Segmentation
Section titled “101. Finding — Segmentation”The corporate network can access CDE management interfaces over SSH.
102. Finding — Third Party
Section titled “102. Finding — Third Party”A fraud analytics provider receives full PAN but is not listed in the PCI service-provider inventory.
103. Finding — Backup
Section titled “103. Finding — Backup”Payment database backups containing encrypted PAN are stored in an account omitted from PCI scope.
104. Scope Gap Register
Section titled “104. Scope Gap Register”Create:
11 PCI Scope Gap RegisterUse:
| Gap ID | Issue | Scope Impact | Severity | Owner |
|---|
105. Root Cause Categories
Section titled “105. Root Cause Categories”Common causes:
Architecture Change
Incomplete Discovery
Documentation Gap
Ownership Gap
Third-Party Change
Weak Change Management106. Root Cause Example
Section titled “106. Root Cause Example”Problem:
Analytics PlatformUnexpectedly Receives PANWhy?
Application Logs Include PANWhy?
Logging Standard Does Not Filter Payment DataRoot cause:
Payment-data handling requirements are not integrated into application logging standards.
107. Correction
Section titled “107. Correction”Stop PAN Logging108. Corrective Action
Section titled “108. Corrective Action”Implement PAN Filtering
Update Secure Development Standard
Add Automated Testing
Monitor Logs109. Annual Scope Validation
Section titled “109. Annual Scope Validation”PCI scope should not remain static.
Perform formal validation regularly and after significant changes.
A practical annual workflow:
Review Payment Channels ↓Review Data Flows ↓Review CDE ↓Review Connectivity ↓Review Security Dependencies ↓Review People / Processes ↓Review Providers ↓Test Segmentation ↓Confirm Exclusions ↓Approve Scope110. Build Annual PCI Scope Validation Package
Section titled “110. Build Annual PCI Scope Validation Package”Create:
12 Annual PCI Scope Validation PackageInclude:
Scope Statement
Payment Channel Register
Cardholder Data Flow
Network Diagram
CDE Asset Inventory
System Classification Matrix
Role Register
Process Register
Provider Register
Segmentation Results
Scope Exclusions
Management Approval111. Scope Validation Owner
Section titled “111. Scope Validation Owner”Recommended accountability:
PCI Program Ownersupported by:
GRC
Security
Network
Cloud
Payments
Engineering112. Management Approval
Section titled “112. Management Approval”The finalized scope should be formally reviewed.
Record:
Scope Version
Approval Date
Approver
Assessment Period113. PCI Scope Dashboard
Section titled “113. PCI Scope Dashboard”Track:
| Metric | Target |
|---|---|
| In-Scope Assets With Owner | 100% |
| Payment Channels Documented | 100% |
| Third Parties Documented | 100% |
| Segmentation Tests Passed | 100% |
| Unapproved CHD Locations | 0 |
| Unknown CDE Connections | 0 |
| Scope Changes Awaiting Review | 0 |
114. PCI Scope KPI
Section titled “114. PCI Scope KPI”Example:
Percentage of in-scope PCI assetswith validated classificationTarget:
100%115. PCI Scope KRI
Section titled “115. PCI Scope KRI”Example:
Number of unknown systemswith CDE connectivityTarget:
0116. PCI Scope Change KRI
Section titled “116. PCI Scope Change KRI”Example:
Significant infrastructure changesimplemented without PCI scope assessment117. Segmentation KRI
Section titled “117. Segmentation KRI”Example:
Failed segmentation test pathsTarget:
0118. Provider Scope KRI
Section titled “118. Provider Scope KRI”Example:
Third parties handling CHDwithout current PCI assurance119. Practical Activity — Classify 20 Systems
Section titled “119. Practical Activity — Classify 20 Systems”Use fictional organization:
CloudShopClassify:
Payment Web Server
Payment API
Payment Database
Tokenization Service
Corporate Laptop
Privileged Workstation
Jump Host
Identity Provider
SIEM
Vulnerability Scanner
CI/CD
Git Repository
Container Registry
Cloud Management Account
Backup Account
DR Environment
Support Platform
HR SaaS
Payment Gateway
Cloud ProviderUse:
CDE
Connected-to
Security-Impacting
Segmentation
Third-Party
Potentially Out of Scope120. Practical Activity — Build Scope Statement
Section titled “120. Practical Activity — Build Scope Statement”Create a formal scope statement for CloudShop covering:
E-Commerce Payments
AWS
External Payment Processor
Central IAM
CI/CD
Security Monitoring121. Practical Activity — Build Scope Exclusion Register
Section titled “121. Practical Activity — Build Scope Exclusion Register”Add:
HR SaaS
Marketing Platform
Internal Wiki
Corporate Training PlatformFor each provide:
Reason
Validation Evidence122. Practical Activity — Analyze Shared Services
Section titled “122. Practical Activity — Analyze Shared Services”Assess whether these enterprise systems affect CDE security:
Entra ID
SIEM
Vulnerability Scanner
Secrets Manager
DNS
NTPDocument the rationale.
123. Practical Activity — Analyze Segmentation
Section titled “123. Practical Activity — Analyze Segmentation”Architecture:
Corporate VPC ↓Transit Gateway ↓CDE VPCRules currently allow:
Corporate Admin Subnet→ CDE HTTPS
Corporate Developer Subnet→ CDE SSHDetermine which connection is legitimate and whether the developer subnet threatens scope reduction.
124. Practical Activity — Assess New CI/CD Platform
Section titled “124. Practical Activity — Assess New CI/CD Platform”A new deployment platform can:
Push Containers
Update Kubernetes Deployments
Modify Infrastructurefor the payment service.
Determine:
PCI Classification
Required Controls
Scope Impact125. Practical Activity — Scope Change Review
Section titled “125. Practical Activity — Scope Change Review”A new fraud provider receives:
PAN
Transaction Amount
Customer IdentifierDocument:
Data Flow Change
Provider Scope
Responsibility
Assurance Required
Scope Statement Update126. PCI Scope Validation Checklist
Section titled “126. PCI Scope Validation Checklist”Payment Channels
Section titled “Payment Channels”-
All channels documented.
-
owners confirmed.
-
payment integrations confirmed.
-
providers confirmed.
-
PAN flows documented.
-
CHD storage documented.
-
SAD handling reviewed.
-
unexpected CHD searched for.
-
storage systems identified.
-
processing systems identified.
-
transmission systems identified.
-
backup and DR included.
Connectivity
Section titled “Connectivity”-
connected systems identified.
-
management paths identified.
-
remote access paths identified.
-
cloud connectivity reviewed.
Security Dependencies
Section titled “Security Dependencies”-
IAM reviewed.
-
SIEM reviewed.
-
vulnerability scanning reviewed.
-
secrets management reviewed.
-
PKI reviewed.
-
CI/CD reviewed.
Segmentation
Section titled “Segmentation”-
segmentation architecture documented.
-
rules reviewed.
-
connectivity technically validated.
-
segmentation testing passed.
-
failures remediated.
People
Section titled “People”-
CHD users identified.
-
CDE admins identified.
-
developers considered.
-
support personnel considered.
-
vendor administrators considered.
Processes
Section titled “Processes”-
payment processing included.
-
refunds included.
-
access management included.
-
change management included.
-
incident response included.
-
vendor governance included.
Third Parties
Section titled “Third Parties”-
payment providers documented.
-
cloud providers documented.
-
outsourced services documented.
-
responsibilities mapped.
-
assurance current.
Exclusions
Section titled “Exclusions”-
exclusion rationale documented.
-
connectivity validated.
-
no CHD confirmed.
-
security dependency ruled out.
Governance
Section titled “Governance”-
scope statement current.
-
scope owner identified.
-
significant-change triggers defined.
-
annual validation completed.
-
management approval recorded.
127. Common PCI Scope Mistakes
Section titled “127. Common PCI Scope Mistakes”Mistake 1 — CDE Equals Full PCI Scope
Section titled “Mistake 1 — CDE Equals Full PCI Scope”Connected and security-impacting systems are missed.
Mistake 2 — Department Ownership Determines Scope
Section titled “Mistake 2 — Department Ownership Determines Scope”Technical relationships matter more.
Mistake 3 — Cloud Provider Compliance Used as Proof of Customer Compliance
Section titled “Mistake 3 — Cloud Provider Compliance Used as Proof of Customer Compliance”Shared responsibility is ignored.
Mistake 4 — CI/CD Ignored
Section titled “Mistake 4 — CI/CD Ignored”Deployment tools can alter payment applications.
Mistake 5 — IAM Ignored
Section titled “Mistake 5 — IAM Ignored”Identity services can control CDE authentication.
Mistake 6 — Shared Services Automatically Pull Entire Enterprise Into Scope
Section titled “Mistake 6 — Shared Services Automatically Pull Entire Enterprise Into Scope”Scope must be analyzed carefully rather than assumed either way.
Mistake 7 — Segmentation Based on Diagram Only
Section titled “Mistake 7 — Segmentation Based on Diagram Only”Actual connectivity is never tested.
Mistake 8 — Scope Exclusions Not Documented
Section titled “Mistake 8 — Scope Exclusions Not Documented”Out-of-scope status becomes difficult to defend.
Mistake 9 — New Providers Added Without PCI Review
Section titled “Mistake 9 — New Providers Added Without PCI Review”Data flows change silently.
Mistake 10 — Scope Updated Only Before Assessment
Section titled “Mistake 10 — Scope Updated Only Before Assessment”Continuous architectural changes are missed.
128. Weak PCI Scope Model
Section titled “128. Weak PCI Scope Model”Payment Database ↓PCI Scope129. Strong PCI Scope Model
Section titled “129. Strong PCI Scope Model”Payment Channels ↓CHD Flow ↓CDE ↓Connected Systems ↓Security Dependencies ↓Administrative Paths ↓Segmentation Controls ↓People ↓Processes ↓Providers ↓Validated Exclusions ↓Defensible PCI Scope130. GRC Analyst Responsibilities
Section titled “130. GRC Analyst Responsibilities”A GRC professional supporting PCI scope management may:
-
Maintain the PCI scope statement.
-
Coordinate payment-channel inventories.
-
Maintain CDE asset inventories.
-
Classify connected systems.
-
Identify security-impacting services.
-
Review administrative paths.
-
Coordinate cloud-control-plane scoping.
-
Review CI/CD dependencies.
-
Maintain scope exclusions.
-
Coordinate segmentation testing.
-
Review provider PCI assurance.
-
Maintain responsibility matrices.
-
Coordinate annual scope validation.
-
review significant changes.
-
document scope gaps.
-
coordinate remediation.
-
support QSA scope discussions.
GRC connects:
Payments
Security
Network
Cloud
IAM
Engineering
DevOps
Security Operations
Support
Procurement
Third Parties
Assessors131. PCI Scope Maturity Model
Section titled “131. PCI Scope Maturity Model”Level 1 — Assumed
Section titled “Level 1 — Assumed”Payment Systems=ScopeLevel 2 — Documented
Section titled “Level 2 — Documented”Assets
Data Flows
Network DiagramsLevel 3 — Validated
Section titled “Level 3 — Validated”Connectivity Testing
Provider Review
Segmentation TestingLevel 4 — Integrated
Section titled “Level 4 — Integrated”CMDB
Cloud Inventory
Change Management
Automated DiscoveryLevel 5 — Continuous Scope Assurance
Section titled “Level 5 — Continuous Scope Assurance”Continuous Asset Discovery
Continuous Connectivity Analysis
Continuous CHD Discovery
Automated Scope Change Alerts132. PCI Scope Mindset
Section titled “132. PCI Scope Mindset”For every system ask:
Does it store CHD?
Does it process CHD?
Does it transmit CHD?
Can it connect to CDE systems?
Can it administer CDE systems?
Can it modify CDE applications?
Can it modify CDE infrastructure?
Does the CDE depend on it for authentication?
Does the CDE depend on it for monitoring?
Does it enforce segmentation?
Does it store CDE backups?
Can it access cryptographic keys?
Does a third party operate it?
If we say it is out of scope,what evidence proves that?For every change ask:
Could this change expand PCI scope?If these questions can be answered with evidence, the PCI scope becomes defensible and manageable.
Key Takeaways
Section titled “Key Takeaways”-
PCI scope is broader than systems that directly store PAN.
-
The CDE remains the starting point for scope analysis.
-
Connected-to systems can create attack paths into the CDE.
-
Security-impacting systems may support IAM, monitoring, vulnerability management, secrets, PKI, and other critical controls.
-
Segmentation systems are central to scope reduction.
-
Cloud control planes and shared cloud-management services can affect PCI scope.
-
CI/CD, source repositories, IaC platforms, registries, and Kubernetes management can affect CDE security.
-
People and processes are part of PCI scope.
-
Third-party payment and infrastructure providers should be mapped to responsibilities and assurance.
-
Scope exclusions require evidence and rationale.
-
Segmentation should be technically validated rather than assumed.
-
Significant changes should trigger PCI scope review.
-
A formal scope statement, asset register, provider register, exclusion register, and segmentation evidence create a defensible scope package.
-
PCI scope validation should operate continuously and be formally reviewed on a recurring basis.
-
GRC coordinates architecture, payment flows, technical teams, third parties, evidence, and assessors to maintain accurate scope.
Knowledge Check
Section titled “Knowledge Check”Before continuing, make sure you can answer:
-
What is PCI DSS scope?
-
How is PCI scope broader than the CDE?
-
What is a connected-to system?
-
What is a security-impacting system?
-
What is a segmentation system?
-
Why can an identity platform affect PCI scope?
-
Why can CI/CD affect PCI scope?
-
Why can cloud management accounts affect PCI scope?
-
How can backup and DR environments affect scope?
-
How are people included in PCI scope?
-
How are processes included in PCI scope?
-
What is scope reduction?
-
Why does tokenization not automatically eliminate PCI scope?
-
Why must segmentation be tested?
-
What happens when segmentation fails?
-
What is a PCI Scope Statement?
-
What should a Scope Exclusion Register contain?
-
Why should third-party responsibilities be documented?
-
What events should trigger PCI scope reassessment?
-
What role does GRC play in PCI scope management?
What’s Next?
Section titled “What’s Next?”➡️ Next: 04 — Network Segmentation
In the next lesson, you will focus specifically on using architecture and network-security controls to isolate the Cardholder Data Environment from the rest of the enterprise.
You will work through:
CDE Boundary ↓Network Zones ↓Firewall Policy ↓Allowed Communication ↓Default Deny ↓Administrative Paths ↓Cloud Segmentation ↓Microsegmentation ↓Segmentation Testing ↓Scope ReductionYou will also build practical artifacts including a PCI Network Segmentation Design, CDE Communication Matrix, Firewall Rule Review Register, Segmentation Test Plan, Segmentation Test Evidence Register, Scope Reduction Assessment, and Segmentation Exception Register.