Skip to content

Runbook 02 — Third-Party Risk Assessment & Vendor Onboarding

Item Details
Runbook 02 — Third-Party Risk Assessment & Vendor Onboarding
Module 01 — GRC Fundamentals
Difficulty Intermediate
Estimated Time 90–120 Minutes
Primary Role GRC Analyst / Third-Party Risk Analyst
Supporting Roles Procurement, Legal, Privacy, Security, Business Owner
Primary Output Vendor Risk Assessment & Approval Record
Runbook Type Third-Party Risk Management

This runbook provides a repeatable process for assessing and onboarding third parties such as:

  • SaaS providers.

  • Cloud providers.

  • Managed service providers.

  • Contractors.

  • Consultants.

  • Software vendors.

  • Data processors.

  • Payment providers.

  • Security vendors.

  • Business partners.

The objective is to ensure that no significant third party begins processing sensitive information, accessing systems, or supporting critical business services without an appropriate level of risk assessment and approval.

The core principle is:

The depth of third-party due diligence should be proportional to the risk introduced by the relationship.

By following this runbook, the GRC team should produce:

  • Vendor intake record.

  • Business owner confirmation.

  • Data classification.

  • Business criticality assessment.

  • Inherent vendor risk score.

  • Vendor risk tier.

  • Due diligence requirements.

  • Security assessment.

  • Assurance-document review.

  • Vendor findings.

  • Residual risk rating.

  • Contractual security requirements.

  • Risk decision.

  • Approval record.

  • Remediation plan.

  • Ongoing monitoring schedule.

  • Reassessment schedule.

  • Offboarding requirements.

Business Need
Vendor Intake
Business Owner
Data Classification
Business Criticality
Inherent Risk Assessment
Vendor Tiering
Due Diligence
Security Questionnaire
Assurance Evidence
Findings
Residual Risk
Contract Review
Risk Decision
Approval
Onboarding
Monitoring
Reassessment
Offboarding

Every assessment should begin with a documented business request.

Record:

Vendor Name
Requested Service
Business Owner
Business Unit
Business Justification
Expected Contract Date
Expected Go-Live Date

Avoid beginning the assessment using only an email such as:

We need this vendor approved today.

The relationship should be formally recorded.

Every vendor must have an internal owner.

The business owner should understand:

  • Why the vendor is needed.

  • Which process it supports.

  • What data will be shared.

  • Which users will use the service.

  • How important the service is.

  • What happens if the vendor fails.

Example:

Vendor:
CloudCollab
Business Owner:
Director of Customer Operations

GRC owns the assessment process.

The business owner owns the business relationship and associated business risk.

Document:

Field Example
Service SaaS Collaboration
Hosting Vendor Managed
Users 1,500
SSO Yes
API Integration Yes
Production Access No
Sensitive Data Yes
Subprocessors Yes

This establishes assessment context.

Ask:

Will the vendor process:
Customer Data?
Employee Data?
Financial Data?
Authentication Data?
Source Code?
Confidential Documents?
Regulated Data?
Payment Data?

Document all applicable categories.

Use the organization’s classification model.

Example:

Public
Internal
Confidential
Restricted

Higher data sensitivity generally increases vendor risk.

Determine whether the vendor will receive:

  • Corporate accounts.

  • Network access.

  • VPN access.

  • Production access.

  • Privileged access.

  • API credentials.

  • Service accounts.

  • Customer-facing access.

Example:

Vendor:
Managed Database Provider
Access:
Privileged production support
Result:
Higher Inherent Risk

Document:

Enterprise
Vendor
Vendor Systems
Subprocessors

Where relevant identify:

  • Data storage locations.

  • Processing locations.

  • Backup locations.

  • Support locations.

  • Subprocessor locations.

This is particularly important for privacy and regulatory requirements.

Phase 3 — Determine Business Criticality

Section titled “Phase 3 — Determine Business Criticality”

Ask:

What happens if the vendor becomes unavailable?

Potential impact:

No Material Impact
Minor Productivity Loss
Department Disruption
Critical Business Service Failure
Customer Service Outage

Use a consistent criticality scale.

Step 9 — Consider Replacement Difficulty

Section titled “Step 9 — Consider Replacement Difficulty”

Assess:

  • Are alternatives readily available?

  • Can the service be replaced quickly?

  • Is significant integration required?

  • Is there data lock-in?

  • Is migration complex?

A vendor may become operationally critical even if it does not process highly sensitive information.

Determine whether the service involves:

  • Privacy obligations.

  • Payment processing.

  • Financial reporting.

  • Healthcare information.

  • Customer contractual commitments.

  • Data residency.

  • Regulated business functions.

Where legal interpretation is required, involve Legal or Compliance.

Phase 4 — Perform Inherent Risk Assessment

Section titled “Phase 4 — Perform Inherent Risk Assessment”

Assess the relationship before considering vendor controls.

Possible factors:

Data Sensitivity
Business Criticality
System Access
Privileged Access
User Population
Integration Complexity
Regulatory Impact
Subprocessor Dependency

Example scoring:

Factor Score
Data Sensitivity 4
Business Criticality 4
System Access 3
Regulatory Impact 3
Subprocessor Dependency 4

Use the organization’s documented methodology.

Example:

Total Score:
18

Possible classification:

Tier 1 — Critical
Tier 2 — High
Tier 3 — Moderate
Tier 4 — Low

Do not alter the tier because the business wants faster approval.

Typical characteristics:

  • Sensitive or regulated data.

  • Critical business service.

  • Privileged access.

  • Significant customer impact.

  • Difficult replacement.

  • High operational dependency.

Required assessment may include:

Full Questionnaire
SOC 2 Review
ISO Review
Penetration-Test Review
BCP / DR Review
Privacy Assessment
Subprocessor Review
Contract Review
Enhanced Monitoring

May require:

  • Full questionnaire.

  • Relevant assurance documents.

  • Security evidence.

  • Contract review.

  • Annual reassessment.

May require:

  • Shorter questionnaire.

  • Selected evidence.

  • Basic security review.

  • Periodic reassessment.

May require:

  • Basic intake.

  • Sanctions or business checks where applicable.

  • Minimal security review.

  • Event-driven reassessment.

The goal is scalability.

Phase 6 — Define Due Diligence Requirements

Section titled “Phase 6 — Define Due Diligence Requirements”

Step 17 — Create the Assessment Checklist

Section titled “Step 17 — Create the Assessment Checklist”

For high-risk vendors, request as applicable:

Security Questionnaire
SOC 2 Type II
ISO/IEC 27001 Certificate
Penetration-Test Summary
Incident Response Information
Business Continuity Information
Privacy Documentation
Subprocessor List
Data Flow Information
Security Policies

Do not ask for every artifact from every vendor.

Record:

Request Owner Due Status
Questionnaire Vendor Aug 10 Open
SOC 2 Vendor Aug 10 Received
ISO Certificate Vendor Aug 10 Received
Pentest Vendor Aug 15 Open

Track requests centrally.

Assess:

Security Governance
IAM
Encryption
Vulnerability Management
Secure Development
Logging & Monitoring
Incident Response
Business Continuity
Privacy
Third-Party Management

Step 20 — Validate Significant Responses

Section titled “Step 20 — Validate Significant Responses”

Questionnaire response:

MFA is implemented.

Ask:

For all users?
For administrators?
Any exclusions?
Which authentication methods?
How is coverage monitored?

For critical controls, request evidence.

Step 21 — Identify Unsupported Assertions

Section titled “Step 21 — Identify Unsupported Assertions”

Example:

Vendor Response:
Annual penetration testing = Yes
Evidence:
None

Result:

Unverified

Do not mark a control effective without reasonable support.

Record:

SOC 1 or SOC 2?
Type I or Type II?
Reporting Period?
Service Scope?

For security assurance, a relevant SOC 2 Type II report may provide significant information.

Confirm that the actual service being purchased is included.

A SOC report covering:

Vendor Payroll Platform

does not necessarily provide assurance over:

Vendor Cloud Security Product

Scope matters.

Identify whether the opinion is:

  • Unmodified.

  • Qualified.

  • Adverse, where applicable.

  • Otherwise modified.

Understand the reason for any modification.

Create a list:

Exception Impact Vendor Response
MFA gap High Remediation
Late access removal Medium Closed

Determine whether exceptions are relevant to your use of the service.

Identify Complementary User Entity Controls.

Example:

Vendor Provides:
SSO Capability
Customer Must:
Enable SSO

Create internal onboarding requirements from these responsibilities.

Step 27 — Review Subservice Organizations

Section titled “Step 27 — Review Subservice Organizations”

Determine whether significant fourth parties are:

  • Included.

  • Carved out.

  • Relevant to your service.

Document major dependencies.

Check:

Organization Name
Certification Standard
Certification Body
Scope
Issue Date
Expiration Date
Locations / Services

Ask:

Does the certification actually cover the service we are purchasing?

If not, do not treat the certificate as sufficient assurance.

Set a future monitoring reminder in the vendor record.

Expired certifications should trigger review.

Phase 10 — Review Penetration-Test Evidence

Section titled “Phase 10 — Review Penetration-Test Evidence”

Confirm:

Testing Date
Scope
Tester
Critical Findings
High Findings
Remediation Status
Retesting

A penetration test several years old may provide limited assurance for a rapidly changing SaaS environment.

Determine whether current testing is required.

Step 33 — Avoid Excessive Sensitive Detail

Section titled “Step 33 — Avoid Excessive Sensitive Detail”

You may not need:

  • Exploit code.

  • Exact vulnerability locations.

  • Credentials.

  • Full technical report.

A suitable executive or assurance summary may be sufficient for TPRM.

Phase 11 — Review Identity & Access Management

Section titled “Phase 11 — Review Identity & Access Management”

Review:

  • MFA.

  • Privileged access.

  • Joiner/Mover/Leaver process.

  • Access reviews.

  • Password controls.

  • Service accounts.

  • Privileged monitoring.

Step 35 — Assess Customer IAM Capabilities

Section titled “Step 35 — Assess Customer IAM Capabilities”

Determine whether the service supports:

  • SSO.

  • Federation.

  • MFA.

  • Role-based access.

  • SCIM.

  • Session controls.

  • Audit logs.

Create onboarding requirements where appropriate.

Confirm:

Encryption in Transit
Encryption at Rest
Key Management
Backup Encryption

Ask:

  • How long is data retained?

  • Can NorthStar define retention?

  • Are backups included?

  • What happens after termination?

Determine:

How deletion is requested.
How long deletion takes.
Whether backups are handled.
Whether deletion can be certified.

Contractual requirements should reflect this.

Phase 13 — Review Vulnerability Management

Section titled “Phase 13 — Review Vulnerability Management”

Review:

  • Scan frequency.

  • Patch process.

  • Critical remediation targets.

  • External attack-surface monitoring.

  • Dependency scanning.

  • Secure coding.

Identify gaps based on risk.

Phase 14 — Review Logging and Monitoring

Section titled “Phase 14 — Review Logging and Monitoring”

Review:

Centralized Logging
SIEM
SOC Monitoring
Privileged Activity Monitoring
Alerting
Log Retention

Also determine what logs are available to NorthStar.

Review:

  • Incident response plan.

  • Response team.

  • Exercises.

  • Customer communication.

  • Forensic capability.

  • Lessons learned.

Step 42 — Compare Notification Requirement

Section titled “Step 42 — Compare Notification Requirement”

Vendor:

72 Hours

Enterprise requirement:

24 Hours

This creates a contractual issue requiring resolution.

Assess:

BCP
DR Plan
RTO
RPO
Backup
Recovery Testing
Service Redundancy

Step 44 — Compare With Business Requirements

Section titled “Step 44 — Compare With Business Requirements”

Example:

Business RTO:
4 Hours
Vendor RTO:
8 Hours

This is a business-risk decision, not just a security observation.

Step 45 — Identify Critical Subprocessors

Section titled “Step 45 — Identify Critical Subprocessors”

Ask:

Which cloud provider?
Which support provider?
Which payment provider?
Which analytics provider?
Which email provider?

Focus on material dependencies.

Determine whether the vendor:

  • Performs due diligence.

  • Maintains supplier inventory.

  • Tracks high-risk suppliers.

  • Includes contractual requirements.

  • Monitors critical dependencies.

Your organization generally cannot directly assess every fourth party.

Use:

Finding ID
Domain
Finding
Evidence
Severity
Risk
Recommendation
Vendor Owner
Target Date
Status

Weak:

MFA Issue

Strong:

One legacy privileged administrative account is not protected by MFA, increasing the risk of unauthorized privileged access if credentials are compromised.

Consider:

Control Weakness
Data Sensitivity
Business Criticality
Threat Exposure
Compensating Controls
Duration
Scope

Severity should be risk based.

Step 50 — Review Remediation Commitments

Section titled “Step 50 — Review Remediation Commitments”

Vendor response:

We plan to resolve this soon.

Insufficient.

Better:

Action:
Enable MFA for legacy administrator.
Owner:
Vendor IAM Team
Target:
30 September 2026
Evidence:
Updated configuration report

Require specific commitments for material findings.

Step 51 — Evaluate Compensating Controls

Section titled “Step 51 — Evaluate Compensating Controls”

If the vendor cannot immediately fix a gap:

Primary Control Missing
Compensating Control
Residual Risk

Assess whether the alternative meaningfully reduces the same risk.

Step 52 — Consider the Control Environment

Section titled “Step 52 — Consider the Control Environment”

Start with inherent risk.

Then consider:

  • Security controls.

  • Assurance quality.

  • Open findings.

  • Compensating controls.

  • Contractual protections.

Inherent Vendor Risk
Vendor Controls
Assurance Evidence
Open Findings
Residual Risk

Possible ratings:

Low
Moderate
High
Critical

Document the rationale.

Example:

Residual Risk:
High
Reason:
Strong overall security program but four unresolved high-risk issues affecting privileged access, resilience, and incident notification.

Use:

Approve
Approve With Conditions
Escalate for Risk Acceptance
Reject

Appropriate where:

  • Residual risk is acceptable.

  • Required controls are in place.

  • Contract requirements are satisfied.

  • No material unresolved issues exist.

Appropriate where:

  • Vendor is needed.

  • Residual risk is manageable.

  • Remediation can occur within defined timeframes.

  • Pre-go-live issues are addressed.

Example:

Decision:
Approve With Conditions

Use where residual risk exceeds standard tolerance but business leadership seeks to proceed.

Record:

Risk
Business Justification
Compensating Controls
Approver
Expiration Date
Review Date

Reject or pause onboarding where risk is unacceptable.

Examples:

No meaningful security program
Critical unresolved vulnerabilities
Refusal to meet incident requirements
Severe assurance gaps
Unacceptable regulatory exposure

Rejection should be evidence based.

Step 59 — Map Findings to Contract Terms

Section titled “Step 59 — Map Findings to Contract Terms”

Contract requirements may include:

Security Controls
MFA
Encryption
Incident Notification
Data Location
Retention
Deletion
Subprocessors
BCP / DR
Audit Rights
Vulnerability Management

GRC identifies security requirements.

Legal determines appropriate contractual language and legal acceptability.

Do not treat security analysts as legal counsel.

Step 61 — Define Mandatory Preconditions

Section titled “Step 61 — Define Mandatory Preconditions”

Example:

Before Go-Live:
Contract Executed
Security Approval Complete
Privacy Approval Complete
SSO Configured
MFA Configured
Critical Findings Resolved
Required Exceptions Approved

Do not allow onboarding to bypass mandatory approval gates.

Step 62 — Configure Customer Security Controls

Section titled “Step 62 — Configure Customer Security Controls”

Examples:

Enable SSO
Enforce MFA
Configure RBAC
Disable Local Authentication Where Appropriate
Create Admin Roles
Enable Audit Logs
Secure API Credentials

Grant only required:

  • User access.

  • Administrative access.

  • API permissions.

  • Integration scopes.

Avoid default broad permissions.

Update vendor inventory:

Status:
Active
Tier:
Tier 1
Risk:
High
Approval:
Conditional
Next Review:
August 2027
ID Finding Owner Due Status
TPR-001 MFA Gap Vendor Sep 30 Open
TPR-002 DR Test Vendor Nov 30 In Progress

For critical/high-risk vendors:

Monthly or Quarterly

depending on severity.

Vendor states:

Fixed.

Request appropriate evidence.

For example:

Updated SOC evidence
Configuration evidence
Updated penetration test
DR test report
Contract amendment

Validate before closure.

Monitor for:

Security Incidents
Breach Notifications
Certification Expiration
Service Outages
Acquisitions
Material Subprocessor Changes
Regulatory Actions
Critical Findings

High-risk vendors require stronger monitoring.

Example:

Vendor:
CloudCollab
Event:
Major cloud outage
Date:
15 October 2026
Impact:
4-hour service disruption
Action:
Resilience risk reassessment

Monitoring should feed into risk management.

Example:

Vendor Tier Review Frequency
Tier 1 Annual
Tier 2 Annual
Tier 3 Every 2 Years
Tier 4 Event Driven

Adjust according to organizational methodology.

At reassessment, update:

Questionnaire
SOC Report
ISO Certificate
Pentest
BCP / DR Evidence
Subprocessor List
Open Findings

Do not simply copy last year’s assessment.

Step 72 — Reassess After Material Events

Section titled “Step 72 — Reassess After Material Events”

Examples:

  • Security breach.

  • Material outage.

  • New service.

  • Increased data sensitivity.

  • New privileged access.

  • Major acquisition.

  • Architecture change.

  • New subprocessor.

  • Regulatory change.

The risk profile may change before the scheduled review.

Example:

Original use:

Internal Collaboration

Later:

Customer Financial Data Added

Vendor risk may change from:

Tier 3

to:

Tier 1

Assessment requirements should increase accordingly.

When a vendor incident occurs:

Vendor Notification
Determine Exposure
Security
Privacy
Legal
Business Owner

Coordinate quickly.

Ask:

Was our data affected?
Were our accounts affected?
Which systems?
Which users?
When did the incident begin?
Is the threat contained?
What actions must we take?

Significant incidents may:

Increase Residual Risk
Create Findings
Trigger Contractual Rights
Require Executive Escalation

Track vendor remediation.

Trigger when:

  • Contract ends.

  • Vendor is replaced.

  • Relationship terminated.

  • Business service no longer required.

Verify:

SSO Disabled
Vendor Accounts Disabled
API Credentials Revoked
Tokens Revoked
VPN Removed
Privileged Access Removed

Confirm:

Required Data Exported
Vendor Data Deleted
Backups Addressed
Deletion Confirmed

Contractual requirements should support this.

Verify:

Webhooks
APIs
SCIM
Service Accounts
Network Connections

are removed.

Set:

Status:
Terminated
Termination Date:
Recorded
Data Deletion:
Confirmed
Access Removal:
Confirmed

The third-party lifecycle is now complete.

Suggested structure:

Vendor
├── Intake
├── Questionnaire
├── SOC
├── ISO
├── Pentest
├── Privacy
├── BCP
├── Contract
├── Findings
└── Approval

Evidence should be centrally controlled.

Retention should align with:

  • Contract requirements.

  • Audit needs.

  • Regulatory obligations.

  • Corporate retention policy.

Protect sensitive vendor documentation.

Useful metrics:

Active Vendors
Critical Vendors
Assessments Pending
Assessments Overdue
High-Risk Findings
Expired Assurance Reports
Open Exceptions
Vendor Incidents

Example:

Metric Result
Active Vendors 510
Tier 1 Vendors 39
Overdue Assessments 14
High Findings 11
Expired SOC Reports 5
Open Exceptions 8

Metrics should support decisions.

Potential KRIs:

Critical Vendors Without Current Assessment
Critical Vendors Without Current SOC / ISO
Overdue High-Risk Vendor Findings
Expired Vendor Exceptions
Material Vendor Incidents
Critical Vendors Without Tested BCP

Rising KRIs should trigger attention.

Escalate when:

Critical Residual Risk
High Risk With No Remediation
Critical Finding Past Due
Vendor Refuses Security Requirement
Material Breach
Major Regulatory Concern
Critical Assurance Report Exception

Escalation may involve:

  • CISO.

  • CRO.

  • Legal.

  • Procurement leadership.

  • Business executive.

  • Risk committee.

Phase 36 — Conditional Approval Governance

Section titled “Phase 36 — Conditional Approval Governance”

Conditional approvals should include:

Conditions
Owner
Due Date
Evidence
Risk Approver
Expiration

Avoid:

Approved for now.

Conditional approval is a formal risk decision.

Mistake 1 — Security Review After Purchase

Section titled “Mistake 1 — Security Review After Purchase”

Assessment should occur before significant commitment where possible.

Mistake 2 — Same Questionnaire for Every Vendor

Section titled “Mistake 2 — Same Questionnaire for Every Vendor”

Assessment depth should be risk based.

Mistake 3 — Treating Certifications as Automatic Approval

Section titled “Mistake 3 — Treating Certifications as Automatic Approval”

Always check scope and relevance.

Review exceptions and their impact.

Customer responsibilities must become internal controls.

Mistake 6 — No Business Criticality Assessment

Section titled “Mistake 6 — No Business Criticality Assessment”

Operational risk may be greater than data-security risk.

Mistake 7 — No Fourth-Party Consideration

Section titled “Mistake 7 — No Fourth-Party Consideration”

Important dependencies may sit behind the vendor.

Security expectations should be enforceable where appropriate.

Every material finding requires ownership and status.

Vendor posture changes.

Old accounts and credentials can remain active.

The business owns the relationship and risk. GRC coordinates and challenges.

  • Vendor request documented.

  • Business owner identified.

  • Service understood.

  • User population documented.

  • Integrations documented.

  • Expected go-live documented.

  • Data types identified.

  • Data classification assigned.

  • Data flow documented.

  • System access identified.

  • Privileged access identified.

  • Subprocessors identified.

  • Business criticality assessed.

  • Regulatory impact assessed.

  • Inherent risk calculated.

  • Vendor tier assigned.

  • Due diligence requirements determined.

  • Questionnaire reviewed.

  • Significant responses validated.

  • SOC report reviewed.

  • SOC scope verified.

  • SOC exceptions reviewed.

  • CUECs documented.

  • ISO certificate validated.

  • Penetration-test evidence reviewed.

  • IAM assessed.

  • Data protection assessed.

  • Vulnerability management assessed.

  • Incident response assessed.

  • BCP / DR assessed.

  • Fourth-party controls assessed.

  • Findings documented.

  • Severity assigned.

  • Vendor responses obtained.

  • Compensating controls evaluated.

  • Residual risk assessed.

  • Contract requirements defined.

  • Approval outcome recorded.

  • Required risk acceptance approved.

  • Contract complete.

  • Mandatory findings resolved.

  • SSO configured.

  • MFA configured.

  • Least privilege applied.

  • Logging enabled.

  • Vendor inventory updated.

  • Open findings tracked.

  • Reassessment date established.

  • Assurance expiration dates tracked.

  • Incident monitoring established.

  • Material change triggers defined.

  • Accounts removed.

  • Credentials revoked.

  • Integrations removed.

  • Data returned.

  • Data deletion confirmed.

  • Vendor inventory updated.

Quick Reference — Vendor Approval Decision Tree

Section titled “Quick Reference — Vendor Approval Decision Tree”
Vendor Requested
Inherent Risk Assessment
Risk Tier
Required Due Diligence Complete?
├── No → Hold Assessment
└── Yes
Material Findings?
├── No → Residual Risk Assessment
└── Yes
Can Findings Be Remediated?
├── Yes → Conditional Approval
└── No
Residual Risk Acceptable?
├── Yes → Risk Acceptance
└── No → Reject / Escalate

A completed vendor assessment package should contain:

01 — Vendor Intake Record
02 — Data Classification & Data Flow
03 — Inherent Risk Assessment
04 — Vendor Tiering Record
05 — Due Diligence Checklist
06 — Security Questionnaire Review
07 — SOC Review
08 — ISO Review
09 — Penetration-Test Review
10 — Control Assessment
11 — Vendor Findings Register
12 — Residual Risk Assessment
13 — Contract Security Requirements
14 — Approval / Risk Acceptance Record
15 — Remediation Tracker
16 — Monitoring Plan
17 — Offboarding Requirements

The vendor is ready for final onboarding when:

Business ownership confirmed
Risk tier established
Required due diligence completed
Evidence reviewed
Material findings understood
Residual risk assessed
Contract requirements agreed
Required approvals obtained
Pre-go-live conditions completed
Monitoring requirements defined

A weak process asks:

Did the vendor complete the questionnaire?

A better process asks:

Does the available evidence support the vendor’s security claims?

A mature process asks:

Given the business use case, data, dependencies, assurance evidence, open findings, and contractual protections, is the residual third-party risk acceptable?

That is the purpose of Third-Party Risk Management.

You have now created a reusable operational process covering the full vendor lifecycle:

Request
Intake
Risk Tiering
Due Diligence
Evidence
Findings
Residual Risk
Approval
Onboarding
Monitoring
Reassessment
Offboarding

With this runbook, you have completed the full Module 01 — GRC Fundamentals sequence.

You have covered:

01 Introduction to GRC
02 Security Governance
03 Enterprise Risk Management
04 Risk Assessment Methodology
05 Policies, Standards & Procedures
06 Security Frameworks Overview
07 Control Design & Implementation
08 Control Testing & Effectiveness
09 Audit & Assurance Fundamentals
10 Compliance Management
11 Third-Party Risk Management

and completed the practical components:

Lab 01
Build an Enterprise Risk Register
Lab 02
Perform a Third-Party Security Risk Assessment
Runbook 01
Security Control Assessment & Evidence Collection
Runbook 02
Third-Party Risk Assessment & Vendor Onboarding

You now have the foundation required to move from general GRC concepts into framework-specific and compliance-specific implementation, including areas such as PCI DSS, SOC 1 / SOC 2, ISO/IEC 27001, cloud compliance, privacy, and other enterprise assurance programs.