Skip to content

06 Risk Treatment Plan

Risk assessment is one of the central components of an ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System.

The standard expects organizations to use a defined, repeatable, and risk-based process to identify and evaluate information-security risks.

This process answers questions such as:

What information or service are we protecting?
What could go wrong?
Why could it happen?
How likely is it?
What would the business impact be?
What controls already exist?
What risk remains?
Is that risk acceptable?
What treatment is required?

A strong ISO risk assessment should be:

  • Consistent.

  • Evidence based.

  • Business aligned.

  • Repeatable.

  • Documented.

  • Owned.

  • Suitable for risk treatment and audit.

For a GRC professional, risk assessment is one of the most important practical ISO/IEC 27001 skills because it directly drives the Risk Treatment Plan and ultimately the Statement of Applicability.

By the end of this lesson, you will be able to:

  • Explain the purpose of ISO/IEC 27001 risk assessment.

  • Define a risk assessment methodology.

  • Establish risk criteria.

  • Define risk acceptance criteria.

  • Identify relevant assets and business services.

  • Identify threats and vulnerabilities.

  • Develop clear risk scenarios.

  • Assess likelihood and impact.

  • Calculate inherent risk.

  • Identify existing controls.

  • Evaluate control effectiveness.

  • Calculate residual risk.

  • Assign risk owners.

  • Determine whether risk is acceptable.

  • Select appropriate risk treatment.

  • Maintain an auditable risk register.

  • Recognize common ISO risk-assessment mistakes.

ISO/IEC 27001 is not intended to be implemented as a generic control checklist.

Instead, the organization should understand its risks and select appropriate controls.

The logic is:

Business Context
Information Security Risk
Risk Assessment
Risk Treatment
Control Selection
Statement of Applicability

Without a meaningful risk assessment, the organization cannot confidently justify why particular controls are necessary.

Within the ISMS, risk assessment supports planning.

It helps determine:

  • Which risks matter.

  • Which risks need treatment.

  • Which controls are needed.

  • Which risks can be accepted.

  • Which objectives should be prioritized.

The risk assessment should use defined criteria so similar risks are evaluated consistently.

These are different activities.

Determines:

What is the risk?
How serious is it?
Who owns it?

Determines:

What should we do about it?
Which controls should be used?
What residual risk will remain?

Risk assessment comes first.

An information-security risk is generally linked to the possibility that an event could negatively affect:

Confidentiality
Integrity
Availability

and ultimately impact business objectives.

For example:

A threat actor may compromise privileged credentials and gain unauthorized access to production systems, resulting in customer data exposure and service disruption.

This is more useful than writing:

Risk:
MFA

or:

Risk:
Phishing

The organization should define how risk will be assessed.

A practical methodology should explain:

  • Risk-identification approach.

  • Likelihood scale.

  • Impact scale.

  • Risk calculation.

  • Risk-rating thresholds.

  • Risk acceptance criteria.

  • Risk ownership.

  • Review frequency.

This creates consistency.

A practical document may include:

Purpose
Scope
Risk Definitions
Likelihood Criteria
Impact Criteria
Risk Matrix
Risk Acceptance Thresholds
Risk Ownership
Treatment Options
Review Frequency
Approval

This becomes a core ISMS artifact.

Suppose two teams assess the same type of risk.

Team A:

High

Team B:

Low

If both are using different definitions of likelihood and impact, the risk register becomes unreliable.

The methodology should reduce this subjectivity.

Risk criteria define how risks will be evaluated.

Typical criteria include:

Likelihood
Impact
Risk Score
Risk Rating
Acceptance Threshold

The criteria should fit the organization’s context.

Use:

Risk Score = Likelihood × Impact

Both values range from:

1 to 5

Maximum score:

25

Example:

Score Rating Description
1 Rare Unlikely under normal circumstances
2 Unlikely Could occur but not expected
3 Possible Could reasonably occur
4 Likely Expected to occur
5 Almost Certain Expected frequently or imminently

Likelihood should not be chosen only by intuition.

Consider:

  • Threat activity.

  • Historical incidents.

  • Attack exposure.

  • Existing vulnerabilities.

  • Ease of exploitation.

  • Frequency of activity.

  • Industry trends.

  • Environmental conditions.

Example:

Internet-Facing System
+
Known Exploitable Vulnerability
+
Active Exploitation
=
Higher Likelihood

Example:

Score Rating Description
1 Insignificant Minimal business impact
2 Minor Limited operational impact
3 Moderate Material business disruption
4 Major Significant customer, financial, or regulatory impact
5 Severe Enterprise-level consequence

Consider multiple dimensions:

Financial
Operational
Customer
Regulatory
Legal
Reputational
Safety

Use the most relevant business impact.

Example:

Customer Personal Data Exposed
Privacy Notification
Customer Impact
Regulatory Exposure

Confidentiality impact may therefore be Major or Severe.

Example:

Financial Records Altered
Incorrect Reporting
Business Decisions Affected

Integrity loss can be highly significant even if no data is disclosed.

Example:

Critical SaaS Platform Unavailable
Customers Cannot Operate
SLA Breach
Revenue Impact

Availability should be assessed using business context.

Example:

Score Rating
1–4 Low
5–9 Moderate
10–16 High
17–25 Critical

These thresholds should be approved as part of the methodology.

The organization should define what level of residual risk may be accepted and by whom.

Example:

Low
→ Normally acceptable
Moderate
→ Risk Owner Approval
High
→ Treatment required or senior approval
Critical
→ Treatment required / executive escalation

This connects methodology to governance.

A risk score below a threshold does not necessarily mean the risk must be accepted.

Other factors may include:

  • Legal obligations.

  • Contractual requirements.

  • Customer commitments.

  • Mandatory policies.

Example:

Residual Risk:
Moderate
Requirement:
MFA contractually mandatory
Result:
Cannot simply accept non-compliance

Before identifying risks, define what is being assessed.

Possible scope:

Customer SaaS Platform
AWS Production Environment
Supporting IAM
Engineering Processes
Third-Party Dependencies

The risk assessment scope should align with the ISMS scope.

Document:

  • Systems.

  • Services.

  • Locations.

  • Business processes.

  • Data.

  • Third parties.

  • Interfaces.

This helps avoid missing relevant risks.

Start with business value.

Example:

Business Service:
Enterprise SaaS Platform
Business Owner:
Chief Product Officer
Criticality:
Critical

Then identify what supports it.

Business Service
Applications
Cloud Infrastructure
Identity
Data
People
Third Parties

This creates a better risk picture than assessing isolated devices.

Assets may include:

Information
Applications
Infrastructure
People
Processes
Cloud Services
Third Parties
Physical Facilities

The organization should use an asset approach that matches its risk methodology.

Examples:

  • Customer data.

  • Source code.

  • Financial records.

  • Employee information.

  • Credentials.

  • Business plans.

Information assets often have direct business value.

Examples:

Cloud Accounts
Databases
SaaS Platforms
Endpoints
Networks
Identity Systems

These enable business services.

Examples:

  • Security operations team.

  • Payroll process.

  • Change-management process.

  • Customer-support workflow.

Risk is not limited to hardware and software.

Where practical, identify ownership.

Example:

Asset Owner
Customer Database Product
AWS Production Cloud Engineering
Entra ID IAM
Source Repository Engineering

Ownership supports risk accountability.

Classify importance.

Example:

Critical
High
Moderate
Low

Criticality may influence impact scoring.

A threat is something capable of causing harm.

Examples include:

External Attacker
Malicious Insider
Human Error
Ransomware
Supply-Chain Attack
Technology Failure
Cloud Outage
Natural Disaster

Risk assessments should focus on credible threats.

Threats may be:

  • Cybercriminal.

  • Insider.

  • Nation-state actor.

  • Competitor.

  • Human error.

  • Misconfiguration.

  • Accidental deletion.

  • Power failure.

  • Hardware failure.

  • Cloud outage.

  • Fire.

Useful information may come from:

  • Internal incidents.

  • Security monitoring.

  • Industry reports.

  • Threat intelligence.

  • Vulnerability intelligence.

  • External advisories.

Threat information can improve likelihood assessment.

A vulnerability is a weakness or condition that can increase the likelihood or impact of a risk scenario.

Examples:

No MFA
Weak Access Review
Public Cloud Exposure
Unsupported Software
Poor Backup Testing
Unsecured API
Manual Vendor Process

A vulnerability is not the same as a risk.

Vulnerability:

Privileged accounts do not use MFA.

Risk:

A threat actor may compromise privileged credentials because strong authentication is not enforced, resulting in unauthorized production access and customer-data exposure.

The risk describes the business consequence.

Use a structured format:

There is a risk that [threat/event] may exploit [vulnerability/condition], resulting in [business impact].

Example:

There is a risk that an external attacker may exploit an internet-facing critical vulnerability, resulting in unauthorized access to production systems and disruption of customer services.

Cloud risk.

Too vague.

There is a risk that cloud storage may be accidentally configured for public access, resulting in unauthorized disclosure of confidential customer information.

This supports clearer scoring and treatment.

A risk taxonomy may help organize the register.

Examples:

Identity
Data Protection
Cloud
Application Security
Third Party
Resilience
Physical Security
Governance
Compliance

Taxonomy supports reporting.

Inherent risk is assessed before considering existing controls.

Example:

Risk:

Privileged account compromise

Assume:

Likelihood = 4
Impact = 5

Then:

Inherent Risk = 20 — Critical

Inherent risk shows the natural exposure associated with an activity.

This is useful for:

  • Prioritizing controls.

  • Understanding business risk.

  • Comparing activities.

  • Assessing control importance.

Next identify safeguards already in place.

Example:

Risk:
Privileged account compromise
Controls:
MFA
PAM
Least Privilege
Access Reviews
Security Monitoring

Do not assume controls are effective merely because they exist.

Controls may come from:

  • Annex A.

  • Internal policy.

  • NIST.

  • CIS.

  • Cloud controls.

  • Regulatory requirements.

In ISO risk assessment, what matters is whether they meaningfully address the risk.

Use defined ratings.

Example:

Rating Meaning
Effective Consistently reduces risk
Partially Effective Weaknesses remain
Ineffective Little meaningful reduction
Not Tested Effectiveness unknown

Evidence should support the conclusion.

Possible evidence:

Control Test
Audit Report
Configuration Review
Metric
Incident History
Monitoring Report

Avoid purely subjective scoring where possible.

Example:

Control:
Quarterly access review

Design may be appropriate.

But if reviews are frequently missed:

Operating Effectiveness:
Weak

Residual risk should reflect actual effectiveness.

46. Step 9 — Determine Residual Likelihood

Section titled “46. Step 9 — Determine Residual Likelihood”

After evaluating controls, reassess likelihood.

Example:

Inherent Likelihood:
4
Controls:
MFA + PAM + Monitoring
Residual Likelihood:
2

Controls reduce probability.

Controls may also reduce impact.

Example:

Ransomware Impact:
5
Strong Recovery Controls:
Reduce outage severity
Residual Impact:
4

Not every control reduces both likelihood and impact.

Calculate:

Residual Risk =
Residual Likelihood × Residual Impact

Example:

Likelihood = 2
Impact = 5
Residual Risk = 10 — High

The risk remains significant.

Inherent Risk
Existing Controls
Control Effectiveness
Residual Risk

Example:

Inherent:
20 Critical
Residual:
10 High

The controls reduce exposure but do not eliminate the risk.

Now compare residual risk with acceptance criteria.

Example:

Residual Rating:
High
Risk Appetite:
High requires treatment
Decision:
Additional treatment required

This is risk evaluation.

Each material risk should have an accountable owner.

Example:

Risk:
Production availability
Risk Owner:
CTO

The owner should have enough authority to influence treatment.

May include:

  • Review assessment.

  • Agree treatment.

  • Monitor residual risk.

  • Request acceptance.

  • Escalate significant issues.

GRC facilitates the process.

Common treatment options:

Mitigate
Avoid
Transfer
Accept

Implement or improve controls.

Example:

Risk:
Credential compromise
Treatment:
Deploy phishing-resistant MFA

Stop the activity creating the risk.

Example:

Risk:
Unsupported internet-facing legacy application
Treatment:
Decommission service

Shift some risk consequences through:

  • Insurance.

  • Contract.

  • Outsourcing.

Transfer does not normally remove all accountability.

Management formally accepts residual exposure.

Risk acceptance should be:

  • Authorized.

  • Documented.

  • Time-bound where appropriate.

  • Periodically reviewed.

Example:

Risk ID:
RISK-005
Residual Risk:
High
Decision:
Mitigate
Action:
Deploy phishing-resistant MFA
Owner:
IAM Director
Target:
31 December 2026

This later feeds into the treatment plan.

A practical ISO risk register may include:

Field
Risk ID
Risk Category
Business Service
Asset
Risk Statement
Threat
Vulnerability
Inherent Likelihood
Inherent Impact
Inherent Score
Existing Controls
Control Effectiveness
Residual Likelihood
Residual Impact
Residual Score
Risk Owner
Treatment
Treatment Action
Due Date
Status
Risk ID:
RISK-001
Risk:
Threat actors may compromise privileged accounts due to phishing-susceptible authentication, resulting in unauthorized production access.
Inherent:
20 — Critical
Controls:
MFA
PAM
Monitoring
Control Effectiveness:
Partially Effective
Residual:
12 — High
Owner:
CISO
Treatment:
Mitigate
Action:
Deploy phishing-resistant MFA

The assessment should be supported by evidence where relevant.

Possible sources:

  • Architecture diagrams.

  • Asset inventory.

  • Vulnerability scans.

  • Audit reports.

  • Incident data.

  • Control testing.

  • Policies.

  • Security metrics.

  • Vendor assessments.

This improves defensibility.

A practical assessment may involve:

GRC
Business Owner
Security
Engineering
IT
Risk Owner

GRC facilitates discussion.

Example:

1. Confirm scope.
2. Review business service.
3. Identify critical assets.
4. Identify threats.
5. Identify vulnerabilities.
6. Develop risk scenarios.
7. Score likelihood and impact.
8. Review controls.
9. Score residual risk.
10. Agree owner and treatment.

Different stakeholders may disagree.

Example:

Security:
Likelihood = 5
Business:
Likelihood = 2

Use evidence.

Ask:

  • Has this happened before?

  • What exposure exists?

  • Are attackers actively exploiting this?

  • What safeguards exist?

  • How reliable are the controls?

Document rationale.

A common mistake is rating everything:

Critical

If every risk is critical, prioritization becomes impossible.

Ratings should follow defined criteria.

Business teams may underestimate risk because treatment is expensive.

Example:

"We've never had an incident,
so likelihood is low."

Historical absence does not automatically mean low future probability.

Assessment should remain objective.

ISO does not require one specific quantitative model, but some organizations may incorporate financial analysis.

Example:

Expected Loss
Downtime Cost
Regulatory Penalty Exposure
Incident Response Cost

These may help leadership understand impact.

Suppose:

SaaS Revenue:
₹20 lakh per hour
Potential Outage:
8 hours

Direct revenue exposure:

₹1.6 crore

This may help justify an impact rating.

Risk:

Cloud storage may be accidentally configured for public access, resulting in disclosure of confidential customer information.

Inherent:

Likelihood:
4
Impact:
5
Score:
20 Critical

Controls:

Infrastructure as Code
Cloud Security Posture Management
Encryption
Access Policies

Effectiveness:

Partially Effective

Residual:

Likelihood:
3
Impact:
5
Score:
15 High

Treatment:

Implement preventive policy-as-code deployment gates.

Risk:

Ransomware may compromise enterprise systems and disrupt critical business services.

Inherent:

5 × 5 = 25 Critical

Controls:

  • EDR.

  • MFA.

  • Segmentation.

  • Backups.

  • Security monitoring.

Residual:

3 × 4 = 12 High

Treatment may include stronger recovery testing.

Risk:

A critical SaaS provider may experience a breach resulting in unauthorized disclosure of customer data.

Consider:

Vendor Security Controls
Data Minimization
Contract Controls
Monitoring
Vendor Assurance

Residual risk depends heavily on the third-party control environment.

Risk:

A privileged employee may intentionally misuse authorized access to extract confidential information.

Controls:

Least Privilege
DLP
PAM
Logging
Access Reviews
Segregation of Duties

Likelihood may remain low but impact may remain high.

Risk:

Failure of a critical cloud region may make customer services unavailable.

Controls:

Multi-AZ Architecture
Backups
Recovery Procedures
Monitoring

Impact depends on RTO and customer commitments.

Risk assessments should occur:

  • At planned intervals.

  • When significant changes occur.

Common planned frequency:

Annual

but this should fit organizational needs.

Triggers may include:

New Product
Major Cloud Migration
New Vendor
Acquisition
Security Incident
Critical Vulnerability
Regulatory Change

Do not wait for annual review if risk materially changes.

Risk-specific reviews may also vary.

Example:

Residual Risk Review Frequency
Critical Monthly
High Quarterly
Moderate Semiannual
Low Annual

This supports continuous risk management.

Track how long high risks remain open.

Example:

Risk:
Critical privileged access gap
Age:
220 days

This may require escalation.

Track whether risk is:

Increasing
Stable
Decreasing

Example:

Previous:
Critical
Current:
High
Trend:
Improving

This helps management understand progress.

After treatment, reassess.

Example:

Initial Residual:
15 High
New Control:
Phishing-resistant MFA
New Residual:
8 Moderate

Risk treatment should demonstrate actual reduction.

Do not assume control implementation automatically reduces risk.

Validate:

  • Is the control deployed?

  • Is coverage complete?

  • Is it operating?

  • Has it been tested?

  • Are exceptions managed?

Then reassess residual risk.

If accepted:

Risk ID
Residual Rating
Reason
Compensating Controls
Risk Owner
Approver
Acceptance Date
Expiration
Review

This should align with governance.

A complete ISO risk assessment may include:

Risk Assessment Methodology
Asset / Service Inventory
Risk Register
Risk Workshop Records
Control Evidence
Risk Acceptance Criteria
Risk Treatment Decisions
Approval Records

This supports auditability.

An ISO auditor may ask:

  • What methodology do you use?

  • How are likelihood and impact defined?

  • Can you show a recent risk assessment?

  • How do you identify risks?

  • Who owns them?

  • What treatment decisions were made?

  • How is acceptance authorized?

  • How do risk results influence the SoA?

You should be able to demonstrate the complete chain.

Example:

Risk:
Privileged account compromise
Treatment:
Implement strong authentication
Control:
Identity & authentication control
SoA:
Applicable

This is one of the most important ISO relationships.

Do not start with:

Annex A checklist
Select everything

Better:

Risk
Treatment
Control selection
Compare against Annex A
Document SoA

Annex A supports treatment, but risk should drive the process.

Listing assets is not the same as identifying risk.

Example:

Malware

without explaining the business consequence.

Ratings become inconsistent.

Prioritization becomes meaningless.

Mistake 5 — Control Effectiveness Assumed

Section titled “Mistake 5 — Control Effectiveness Assumed”

Controls should be evaluated.

Risk decisions lack accountability.

There is no consistent decision threshold.

Significant changes should trigger reassessment.

Assessment becomes documentation rather than management.

Control selection becomes disconnected from risk.

Risk:
Phishing
Score:
High
Risk:
Threat actors may compromise workforce credentials through phishing, resulting in unauthorized access to customer-facing systems.
Inherent:
20 Critical
Controls:
Email Security
MFA
Training
Effectiveness:
Partial
Residual:
12 High
Treatment:
Deploy phishing-resistant MFA
Owner:
CISO

The strong version supports governance and action.

88. Practical Activity — Build Risk Methodology

Section titled “88. Practical Activity — Build Risk Methodology”

Create:

01 ISO Risk Assessment Methodology

Include:

  • Risk definitions.

  • Likelihood scale.

  • Impact scale.

  • Risk matrix.

  • Acceptance criteria.

  • Ownership.

  • Treatment options.

  • Review frequency.

89. Practical Activity — Build Risk Register

Section titled “89. Practical Activity — Build Risk Register”

Create:

02 ISO Information Security Risk Register

Recommended fields:

Risk ID
Business Service
Asset
Threat
Vulnerability
Risk Statement
Likelihood
Impact
Inherent Risk
Existing Controls
Control Effectiveness
Residual Likelihood
Residual Impact
Residual Risk
Risk Owner
Treatment
Action
Due Date
Status

Create at least ten risks across:

Identity
Cloud
Application Security
Data
Third Party
Incident Response
Business Continuity
Physical Security
Governance
Compliance

Write complete risk scenarios.

91. Practical Activity — Build Risk Acceptance Criteria

Section titled “91. Practical Activity — Build Risk Acceptance Criteria”

Create:

03 Risk Acceptance Criteria

Example:

Risk Treatment Expectation
Low May accept
Moderate Owner decision
High Treat or senior approval
Critical Executive escalation

Adapt to organizational governance.

92. Practical Activity — Build Treatment Decision Record

Section titled “92. Practical Activity — Build Treatment Decision Record”

Create:

04 Risk Treatment Decision Register

Use:

Risk Decision Control/Action Owner Due

This will prepare you for the next lesson.

93. Practical Activity — Build Risk Approval Record

Section titled “93. Practical Activity — Build Risk Approval Record”

Create:

05 Risk Acceptance Record

Include:

  • Risk.

  • Residual score.

  • Business justification.

  • Compensating controls.

  • Approver.

  • Expiration.

  • Review date.

Before completing an assessment, verify:

  • Assessment scope defined.

  • Business services identified.

  • Assets identified.

  • Threats identified.

  • Vulnerabilities identified.

  • Risk statements documented.

  • Likelihood scored.

  • Impact scored.

  • Inherent risk calculated.

  • Existing controls identified.

  • Control effectiveness evaluated.

  • Residual risk calculated.

  • Risk owner assigned.

  • Acceptance criteria applied.

  • Treatment decision documented.

  • Approval captured.

  • Review frequency established.

As a GRC professional, you may:

  • Maintain the risk methodology.

  • Facilitate assessment workshops.

  • Identify risk scenarios.

  • Guide scoring.

  • Challenge unsupported assumptions.

  • Maintain the risk register.

  • Coordinate control evidence.

  • Track risk owners.

  • Document treatment decisions.

  • Coordinate risk acceptance.

  • Monitor remediation.

  • Reassess residual risk.

  • Prepare risk reporting.

  • Link risk results to the SoA.

This is one of the core operational responsibilities in an ISO/IEC 27001 program.

A practical model may be:

GRC
Facilitates Assessment
Business Owner
Provides Business Context
Security / Technology
Provides Technical Evidence
Risk Owner
Owns Risk Decision
Leadership
Approves Significant Risk

Risk assessment should be collaborative.

Unstructured
Inconsistent scoring
Methodology
Risk Register
Ownership
Treatment Tracking
Periodic Review
Evidence-Based Scoring
Risks Linked to Controls
SoA
Audits
Compliance
Continuous Monitoring
Dynamic Risk Signals
Automated Reassessment

When performing an ISO risk assessment, ask:

What business service are we protecting?
What information matters?
What could happen?
Why could it happen?
How likely is it?
What would the business impact be?
Which controls already reduce risk?
How effective are those controls?
What risk remains?
Is that risk acceptable?
What treatment is required?
Who owns the decision?

If these questions are answered clearly, the assessment is likely meaningful.

  • ISO/IEC 27001 risk assessment should be structured, repeatable, and risk based.

  • Risk methodology should define likelihood, impact, scoring, acceptance criteria, and ownership.

  • Business services and information assets provide context for risk identification.

  • Threats and vulnerabilities should be translated into clear business-oriented risk scenarios.

  • Inherent risk is assessed before controls.

  • Control effectiveness should be evaluated rather than assumed.

  • Residual risk represents exposure remaining after controls.

  • Residual risk should be evaluated against approved acceptance criteria.

  • Every material risk should have an owner.

  • Risk treatment may involve mitigation, avoidance, transfer, or acceptance.

  • Risk assessments should be reviewed periodically and after significant change.

  • Risk results should directly influence the Risk Treatment Plan and Statement of Applicability.

  • GRC professionals facilitate, document, challenge, and govern the risk assessment process.

Before continuing, make sure you can answer:

  1. Why is risk assessment central to ISO/IEC 27001?

  2. What should a risk methodology define?

  3. What is risk criteria?

  4. What are risk acceptance criteria?

  5. What is inherent risk?

  6. What is residual risk?

  7. What is the difference between a threat and vulnerability?

  8. What is a good risk statement?

  9. Why should business services be identified?

  10. What factors influence likelihood?

  11. What factors influence impact?

  12. Why should control effectiveness be evaluated?

  13. What is risk evaluation?

  14. What are the four common risk-treatment options?

  15. What is the role of a risk owner?

  16. When should risk reassessment occur?

  17. Why should accepted risk be formally documented?

  18. How does risk assessment connect to the Statement of Applicability?

  19. Why should Annex A not be used as the starting point for risk assessment?

  20. What role does GRC play in ISO risk assessment?

➡️ Next: 07 — Risk Treatment Plan

In the next lesson, you will move from identifying and evaluating information-security risks into deciding how each unacceptable risk will be treated.

You will learn how to:

Review Residual Risk
Determine Treatment Strategy
Select Security Controls
Assign Control Owners
Define Remediation Actions
Establish Target Dates
Estimate Target Residual Risk
Obtain Risk Owner Approval
Track Implementation

You will also build the practical artifacts needed for ISO/IEC 27001 implementation, including a Risk Treatment Plan, Risk Treatment Decision Matrix, Treatment Action Tracker, Residual Risk Approval Record, and Control Mapping Register.

These outputs will directly prepare you for the next major ISO artifact: the Statement of Applicability.