06 Risk Treatment Plan
Risk assessment is one of the central components of an ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System.
The standard expects organizations to use a defined, repeatable, and risk-based process to identify and evaluate information-security risks.
This process answers questions such as:
What information or service are we protecting? ↓What could go wrong? ↓Why could it happen? ↓How likely is it? ↓What would the business impact be? ↓What controls already exist? ↓What risk remains? ↓Is that risk acceptable? ↓What treatment is required?A strong ISO risk assessment should be:
-
Consistent.
-
Evidence based.
-
Business aligned.
-
Repeatable.
-
Documented.
-
Owned.
-
Suitable for risk treatment and audit.
For a GRC professional, risk assessment is one of the most important practical ISO/IEC 27001 skills because it directly drives the Risk Treatment Plan and ultimately the Statement of Applicability.
Learning Objectives
Section titled “Learning Objectives”By the end of this lesson, you will be able to:
-
Explain the purpose of ISO/IEC 27001 risk assessment.
-
Define a risk assessment methodology.
-
Establish risk criteria.
-
Define risk acceptance criteria.
-
Identify relevant assets and business services.
-
Identify threats and vulnerabilities.
-
Develop clear risk scenarios.
-
Assess likelihood and impact.
-
Calculate inherent risk.
-
Identify existing controls.
-
Evaluate control effectiveness.
-
Calculate residual risk.
-
Assign risk owners.
-
Determine whether risk is acceptable.
-
Select appropriate risk treatment.
-
Maintain an auditable risk register.
-
Recognize common ISO risk-assessment mistakes.
1. Why Risk Assessment Matters
Section titled “1. Why Risk Assessment Matters”ISO/IEC 27001 is not intended to be implemented as a generic control checklist.
Instead, the organization should understand its risks and select appropriate controls.
The logic is:
Business Context ↓Information Security Risk ↓Risk Assessment ↓Risk Treatment ↓Control Selection ↓Statement of ApplicabilityWithout a meaningful risk assessment, the organization cannot confidently justify why particular controls are necessary.
2. Risk Assessment and Clause 6
Section titled “2. Risk Assessment and Clause 6”Within the ISMS, risk assessment supports planning.
It helps determine:
-
Which risks matter.
-
Which risks need treatment.
-
Which controls are needed.
-
Which risks can be accepted.
-
Which objectives should be prioritized.
The risk assessment should use defined criteria so similar risks are evaluated consistently.
3. Risk Assessment vs Risk Treatment
Section titled “3. Risk Assessment vs Risk Treatment”These are different activities.
Risk Assessment
Section titled “Risk Assessment”Determines:
What is the risk?How serious is it?Who owns it?Risk Treatment
Section titled “Risk Treatment”Determines:
What should we do about it?Which controls should be used?What residual risk will remain?Risk assessment comes first.
4. Information Security Risk
Section titled “4. Information Security Risk”An information-security risk is generally linked to the possibility that an event could negatively affect:
Confidentiality
Integrity
Availabilityand ultimately impact business objectives.
For example:
A threat actor may compromise privileged credentials and gain unauthorized access to production systems, resulting in customer data exposure and service disruption.
This is more useful than writing:
Risk:MFAor:
Risk:Phishing5. Risk Methodology
Section titled “5. Risk Methodology”The organization should define how risk will be assessed.
A practical methodology should explain:
-
Risk-identification approach.
-
Likelihood scale.
-
Impact scale.
-
Risk calculation.
-
Risk-rating thresholds.
-
Risk acceptance criteria.
-
Risk ownership.
-
Review frequency.
This creates consistency.
6. Risk Assessment Methodology Document
Section titled “6. Risk Assessment Methodology Document”A practical document may include:
Purpose
Scope
Risk Definitions
Likelihood Criteria
Impact Criteria
Risk Matrix
Risk Acceptance Thresholds
Risk Ownership
Treatment Options
Review Frequency
ApprovalThis becomes a core ISMS artifact.
7. Consistency Matters
Section titled “7. Consistency Matters”Suppose two teams assess the same type of risk.
Team A:
HighTeam B:
LowIf both are using different definitions of likelihood and impact, the risk register becomes unreliable.
The methodology should reduce this subjectivity.
8. Risk Criteria
Section titled “8. Risk Criteria”Risk criteria define how risks will be evaluated.
Typical criteria include:
Likelihood
Impact
Risk Score
Risk Rating
Acceptance ThresholdThe criteria should fit the organization’s context.
9. Example 5 × 5 Methodology
Section titled “9. Example 5 × 5 Methodology”Use:
Risk Score = Likelihood × ImpactBoth values range from:
1 to 5Maximum score:
2510. Likelihood Scale
Section titled “10. Likelihood Scale”Example:
| Score | Rating | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rare | Unlikely under normal circumstances |
| 2 | Unlikely | Could occur but not expected |
| 3 | Possible | Could reasonably occur |
| 4 | Likely | Expected to occur |
| 5 | Almost Certain | Expected frequently or imminently |
Likelihood should not be chosen only by intuition.
11. Likelihood Factors
Section titled “11. Likelihood Factors”Consider:
-
Threat activity.
-
Historical incidents.
-
Attack exposure.
-
Existing vulnerabilities.
-
Ease of exploitation.
-
Frequency of activity.
-
Industry trends.
-
Environmental conditions.
Example:
Internet-Facing System +Known Exploitable Vulnerability +Active Exploitation =Higher Likelihood12. Impact Scale
Section titled “12. Impact Scale”Example:
| Score | Rating | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Insignificant | Minimal business impact |
| 2 | Minor | Limited operational impact |
| 3 | Moderate | Material business disruption |
| 4 | Major | Significant customer, financial, or regulatory impact |
| 5 | Severe | Enterprise-level consequence |
13. Impact Dimensions
Section titled “13. Impact Dimensions”Consider multiple dimensions:
Financial
Operational
Customer
Regulatory
Legal
Reputational
SafetyUse the most relevant business impact.
14. Confidentiality Impact
Section titled “14. Confidentiality Impact”Example:
Customer Personal Data Exposed ↓Privacy Notification ↓Customer Impact ↓Regulatory ExposureConfidentiality impact may therefore be Major or Severe.
15. Integrity Impact
Section titled “15. Integrity Impact”Example:
Financial Records Altered ↓Incorrect Reporting ↓Business Decisions AffectedIntegrity loss can be highly significant even if no data is disclosed.
16. Availability Impact
Section titled “16. Availability Impact”Example:
Critical SaaS Platform Unavailable ↓Customers Cannot Operate ↓SLA Breach ↓Revenue ImpactAvailability should be assessed using business context.
17. Risk Rating Thresholds
Section titled “17. Risk Rating Thresholds”Example:
| Score | Rating |
|---|---|
| 1–4 | Low |
| 5–9 | Moderate |
| 10–16 | High |
| 17–25 | Critical |
These thresholds should be approved as part of the methodology.
18. Risk Acceptance Criteria
Section titled “18. Risk Acceptance Criteria”The organization should define what level of residual risk may be accepted and by whom.
Example:
Low→ Normally acceptable
Moderate→ Risk Owner Approval
High→ Treatment required or senior approval
Critical→ Treatment required / executive escalationThis connects methodology to governance.
19. Risk Acceptance Is Not Automatic
Section titled “19. Risk Acceptance Is Not Automatic”A risk score below a threshold does not necessarily mean the risk must be accepted.
Other factors may include:
-
Legal obligations.
-
Contractual requirements.
-
Customer commitments.
-
Mandatory policies.
Example:
Residual Risk:Moderate
Requirement:MFA contractually mandatory
Result:Cannot simply accept non-compliance20. Step 1 — Define Assessment Scope
Section titled “20. Step 1 — Define Assessment Scope”Before identifying risks, define what is being assessed.
Possible scope:
Customer SaaS Platform
AWS Production Environment
Supporting IAM
Engineering Processes
Third-Party DependenciesThe risk assessment scope should align with the ISMS scope.
21. Assessment Boundaries
Section titled “21. Assessment Boundaries”Document:
-
Systems.
-
Services.
-
Locations.
-
Business processes.
-
Data.
-
Third parties.
-
Interfaces.
This helps avoid missing relevant risks.
22. Step 2 — Identify Business Services
Section titled “22. Step 2 — Identify Business Services”Start with business value.
Example:
Business Service:Enterprise SaaS Platform
Business Owner:Chief Product Officer
Criticality:CriticalThen identify what supports it.
23. Business Service Dependency Model
Section titled “23. Business Service Dependency Model”Business Service ↓Applications ↓Cloud Infrastructure ↓Identity ↓Data ↓People ↓Third PartiesThis creates a better risk picture than assessing isolated devices.
24. Step 3 — Identify Assets
Section titled “24. Step 3 — Identify Assets”Assets may include:
Information
Applications
Infrastructure
People
Processes
Cloud Services
Third Parties
Physical FacilitiesThe organization should use an asset approach that matches its risk methodology.
25. Information Assets
Section titled “25. Information Assets”Examples:
-
Customer data.
-
Source code.
-
Financial records.
-
Employee information.
-
Credentials.
-
Business plans.
Information assets often have direct business value.
26. Technology Assets
Section titled “26. Technology Assets”Examples:
Cloud Accounts
Databases
SaaS Platforms
Endpoints
Networks
Identity SystemsThese enable business services.
27. People and Process Assets
Section titled “27. People and Process Assets”Examples:
-
Security operations team.
-
Payroll process.
-
Change-management process.
-
Customer-support workflow.
Risk is not limited to hardware and software.
28. Asset Ownership
Section titled “28. Asset Ownership”Where practical, identify ownership.
Example:
| Asset | Owner |
|---|---|
| Customer Database | Product |
| AWS Production | Cloud Engineering |
| Entra ID | IAM |
| Source Repository | Engineering |
Ownership supports risk accountability.
29. Asset Criticality
Section titled “29. Asset Criticality”Classify importance.
Example:
Critical
High
Moderate
LowCriticality may influence impact scoring.
30. Step 4 — Identify Threats
Section titled “30. Step 4 — Identify Threats”A threat is something capable of causing harm.
Examples include:
External Attacker
Malicious Insider
Human Error
Ransomware
Supply-Chain Attack
Technology Failure
Cloud Outage
Natural DisasterRisk assessments should focus on credible threats.
31. Threat Sources
Section titled “31. Threat Sources”Threats may be:
Malicious
Section titled “Malicious”-
Cybercriminal.
-
Insider.
-
Nation-state actor.
-
Competitor.
Accidental
Section titled “Accidental”-
Human error.
-
Misconfiguration.
-
Accidental deletion.
Environmental / Technical
Section titled “Environmental / Technical”-
Power failure.
-
Hardware failure.
-
Cloud outage.
-
Fire.
32. Threat Intelligence
Section titled “32. Threat Intelligence”Useful information may come from:
-
Internal incidents.
-
Security monitoring.
-
Industry reports.
-
Threat intelligence.
-
Vulnerability intelligence.
-
External advisories.
Threat information can improve likelihood assessment.
33. Step 5 — Identify Vulnerabilities
Section titled “33. Step 5 — Identify Vulnerabilities”A vulnerability is a weakness or condition that can increase the likelihood or impact of a risk scenario.
Examples:
No MFA
Weak Access Review
Public Cloud Exposure
Unsupported Software
Poor Backup Testing
Unsecured API
Manual Vendor ProcessA vulnerability is not the same as a risk.
34. Vulnerability vs Risk
Section titled “34. Vulnerability vs Risk”Vulnerability:
Privileged accounts do not use MFA.Risk:
A threat actor may compromise privileged credentials because strong authentication is not enforced, resulting in unauthorized production access and customer-data exposure.
The risk describes the business consequence.
35. Step 6 — Develop Risk Scenarios
Section titled “35. Step 6 — Develop Risk Scenarios”Use a structured format:
There is a risk that [threat/event] may exploit [vulnerability/condition], resulting in [business impact].
Example:
There is a risk that an external attacker may exploit an internet-facing critical vulnerability, resulting in unauthorized access to production systems and disruption of customer services.
36. Weak Risk Statement
Section titled “36. Weak Risk Statement”Cloud risk.Too vague.
37. Better Risk Statement
Section titled “37. Better Risk Statement”There is a risk that cloud storage may be accidentally configured for public access, resulting in unauthorized disclosure of confidential customer information.
This supports clearer scoring and treatment.
38. Risk Categories
Section titled “38. Risk Categories”A risk taxonomy may help organize the register.
Examples:
Identity
Data Protection
Cloud
Application Security
Third Party
Resilience
Physical Security
Governance
ComplianceTaxonomy supports reporting.
39. Step 7 — Assess Inherent Likelihood
Section titled “39. Step 7 — Assess Inherent Likelihood”Inherent risk is assessed before considering existing controls.
Example:
Risk:
Privileged account compromiseAssume:
Likelihood = 4Impact = 5Then:
Inherent Risk = 20 — Critical40. Why Inherent Risk Matters
Section titled “40. Why Inherent Risk Matters”Inherent risk shows the natural exposure associated with an activity.
This is useful for:
-
Prioritizing controls.
-
Understanding business risk.
-
Comparing activities.
-
Assessing control importance.
41. Step 8 — Identify Existing Controls
Section titled “41. Step 8 — Identify Existing Controls”Next identify safeguards already in place.
Example:
Risk:Privileged account compromise
Controls:
MFA
PAM
Least Privilege
Access Reviews
Security MonitoringDo not assume controls are effective merely because they exist.
42. Control Sources
Section titled “42. Control Sources”Controls may come from:
-
Annex A.
-
Internal policy.
-
NIST.
-
CIS.
-
Cloud controls.
-
Regulatory requirements.
In ISO risk assessment, what matters is whether they meaningfully address the risk.
43. Control Effectiveness
Section titled “43. Control Effectiveness”Use defined ratings.
Example:
| Rating | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Effective | Consistently reduces risk |
| Partially Effective | Weaknesses remain |
| Ineffective | Little meaningful reduction |
| Not Tested | Effectiveness unknown |
Evidence should support the conclusion.
44. Control Effectiveness Evidence
Section titled “44. Control Effectiveness Evidence”Possible evidence:
Control Test
Audit Report
Configuration Review
Metric
Incident History
Monitoring ReportAvoid purely subjective scoring where possible.
45. Control Design vs Operation
Section titled “45. Control Design vs Operation”Example:
Control:Quarterly access reviewDesign may be appropriate.
But if reviews are frequently missed:
Operating Effectiveness:WeakResidual risk should reflect actual effectiveness.
46. Step 9 — Determine Residual Likelihood
Section titled “46. Step 9 — Determine Residual Likelihood”After evaluating controls, reassess likelihood.
Example:
Inherent Likelihood:4
Controls:MFA + PAM + Monitoring
Residual Likelihood:2Controls reduce probability.
47. Step 10 — Determine Residual Impact
Section titled “47. Step 10 — Determine Residual Impact”Controls may also reduce impact.
Example:
Ransomware Impact:5
Strong Recovery Controls:Reduce outage severity
Residual Impact:4Not every control reduces both likelihood and impact.
48. Residual Risk
Section titled “48. Residual Risk”Calculate:
Residual Risk =Residual Likelihood × Residual ImpactExample:
Likelihood = 2Impact = 5
Residual Risk = 10 — HighThe risk remains significant.
49. Inherent vs Residual Risk
Section titled “49. Inherent vs Residual Risk”Inherent Risk ↓Existing Controls ↓Control Effectiveness ↓Residual RiskExample:
Inherent:20 Critical
Residual:10 HighThe controls reduce exposure but do not eliminate the risk.
50. Risk Evaluation
Section titled “50. Risk Evaluation”Now compare residual risk with acceptance criteria.
Example:
Residual Rating:High
Risk Appetite:High requires treatment
Decision:Additional treatment requiredThis is risk evaluation.
51. Step 11 — Assign Risk Owner
Section titled “51. Step 11 — Assign Risk Owner”Each material risk should have an accountable owner.
Example:
Risk:Production availability
Risk Owner:CTOThe owner should have enough authority to influence treatment.
52. Risk Owner Responsibilities
Section titled “52. Risk Owner Responsibilities”May include:
-
Review assessment.
-
Agree treatment.
-
Monitor residual risk.
-
Request acceptance.
-
Escalate significant issues.
GRC facilitates the process.
53. Step 12 — Determine Treatment
Section titled “53. Step 12 — Determine Treatment”Common treatment options:
Mitigate
Avoid
Transfer
Accept54. Mitigate
Section titled “54. Mitigate”Implement or improve controls.
Example:
Risk:Credential compromise
Treatment:Deploy phishing-resistant MFA55. Avoid
Section titled “55. Avoid”Stop the activity creating the risk.
Example:
Risk:Unsupported internet-facing legacy application
Treatment:Decommission service56. Transfer
Section titled “56. Transfer”Shift some risk consequences through:
-
Insurance.
-
Contract.
-
Outsourcing.
Transfer does not normally remove all accountability.
57. Accept
Section titled “57. Accept”Management formally accepts residual exposure.
Risk acceptance should be:
-
Authorized.
-
Documented.
-
Time-bound where appropriate.
-
Periodically reviewed.
58. Risk Treatment Decision Record
Section titled “58. Risk Treatment Decision Record”Example:
Risk ID:RISK-005
Residual Risk:High
Decision:Mitigate
Action:Deploy phishing-resistant MFA
Owner:IAM Director
Target:31 December 2026This later feeds into the treatment plan.
59. Risk Register
Section titled “59. Risk Register”A practical ISO risk register may include:
| Field |
|---|
| Risk ID |
| Risk Category |
| Business Service |
| Asset |
| Risk Statement |
| Threat |
| Vulnerability |
| Inherent Likelihood |
| Inherent Impact |
| Inherent Score |
| Existing Controls |
| Control Effectiveness |
| Residual Likelihood |
| Residual Impact |
| Residual Score |
| Risk Owner |
| Treatment |
| Treatment Action |
| Due Date |
| Status |
60. Example Risk Record
Section titled “60. Example Risk Record”Risk ID:RISK-001
Risk:Threat actors may compromise privileged accounts due to phishing-susceptible authentication, resulting in unauthorized production access.
Inherent:20 — Critical
Controls:MFAPAMMonitoring
Control Effectiveness:Partially Effective
Residual:12 — High
Owner:CISO
Treatment:Mitigate
Action:Deploy phishing-resistant MFA61. Risk Evidence
Section titled “61. Risk Evidence”The assessment should be supported by evidence where relevant.
Possible sources:
-
Architecture diagrams.
-
Asset inventory.
-
Vulnerability scans.
-
Audit reports.
-
Incident data.
-
Control testing.
-
Policies.
-
Security metrics.
-
Vendor assessments.
This improves defensibility.
62. Risk Assessment Workshop
Section titled “62. Risk Assessment Workshop”A practical assessment may involve:
GRC
Business Owner
Security
Engineering
IT
Risk OwnerGRC facilitates discussion.
63. Risk Workshop Agenda
Section titled “63. Risk Workshop Agenda”Example:
1. Confirm scope.
2. Review business service.
3. Identify critical assets.
4. Identify threats.
5. Identify vulnerabilities.
6. Develop risk scenarios.
7. Score likelihood and impact.
8. Review controls.
9. Score residual risk.
10. Agree owner and treatment.64. Managing Scoring Disagreement
Section titled “64. Managing Scoring Disagreement”Different stakeholders may disagree.
Example:
Security:Likelihood = 5
Business:Likelihood = 2Use evidence.
Ask:
-
Has this happened before?
-
What exposure exists?
-
Are attackers actively exploiting this?
-
What safeguards exist?
-
How reliable are the controls?
Document rationale.
65. Avoiding Risk Inflation
Section titled “65. Avoiding Risk Inflation”A common mistake is rating everything:
CriticalIf every risk is critical, prioritization becomes impossible.
Ratings should follow defined criteria.
66. Avoiding Risk Minimization
Section titled “66. Avoiding Risk Minimization”Business teams may underestimate risk because treatment is expensive.
Example:
"We've never had an incident,so likelihood is low."Historical absence does not automatically mean low future probability.
Assessment should remain objective.
67. Quantitative Considerations
Section titled “67. Quantitative Considerations”ISO does not require one specific quantitative model, but some organizations may incorporate financial analysis.
Example:
Expected Loss
Downtime Cost
Regulatory Penalty Exposure
Incident Response CostThese may help leadership understand impact.
68. Example Financial Impact
Section titled “68. Example Financial Impact”Suppose:
SaaS Revenue:₹20 lakh per hour
Potential Outage:8 hoursDirect revenue exposure:
₹1.6 croreThis may help justify an impact rating.
69. Scenario — Cloud Misconfiguration
Section titled “69. Scenario — Cloud Misconfiguration”Risk:
Cloud storage may be accidentally configured for public access, resulting in disclosure of confidential customer information.
Inherent:
Likelihood:4
Impact:5
Score:20 CriticalControls:
Infrastructure as Code
Cloud Security Posture Management
Encryption
Access PoliciesEffectiveness:
Partially EffectiveResidual:
Likelihood:3
Impact:5
Score:15 HighTreatment:
Implement preventive policy-as-code deployment gates.70. Scenario — Ransomware
Section titled “70. Scenario — Ransomware”Risk:
Ransomware may compromise enterprise systems and disrupt critical business services.
Inherent:
5 × 5 = 25 CriticalControls:
-
EDR.
-
MFA.
-
Segmentation.
-
Backups.
-
Security monitoring.
Residual:
3 × 4 = 12 HighTreatment may include stronger recovery testing.
71. Scenario — Third-Party Breach
Section titled “71. Scenario — Third-Party Breach”Risk:
A critical SaaS provider may experience a breach resulting in unauthorized disclosure of customer data.
Consider:
Vendor Security Controls
Data Minimization
Contract Controls
Monitoring
Vendor AssuranceResidual risk depends heavily on the third-party control environment.
72. Scenario — Insider Threat
Section titled “72. Scenario — Insider Threat”Risk:
A privileged employee may intentionally misuse authorized access to extract confidential information.
Controls:
Least Privilege
DLP
PAM
Logging
Access Reviews
Segregation of DutiesLikelihood may remain low but impact may remain high.
73. Scenario — Service Outage
Section titled “73. Scenario — Service Outage”Risk:
Failure of a critical cloud region may make customer services unavailable.
Controls:
Multi-AZ Architecture
Backups
Recovery Procedures
MonitoringImpact depends on RTO and customer commitments.
74. Risk Assessment Frequency
Section titled “74. Risk Assessment Frequency”Risk assessments should occur:
-
At planned intervals.
-
When significant changes occur.
Common planned frequency:
Annualbut this should fit organizational needs.
75. Event-Driven Risk Assessment
Section titled “75. Event-Driven Risk Assessment”Triggers may include:
New Product
Major Cloud Migration
New Vendor
Acquisition
Security Incident
Critical Vulnerability
Regulatory ChangeDo not wait for annual review if risk materially changes.
76. Risk Review Frequency
Section titled “76. Risk Review Frequency”Risk-specific reviews may also vary.
Example:
| Residual Risk | Review Frequency |
|---|---|
| Critical | Monthly |
| High | Quarterly |
| Moderate | Semiannual |
| Low | Annual |
This supports continuous risk management.
77. Risk Aging
Section titled “77. Risk Aging”Track how long high risks remain open.
Example:
Risk:Critical privileged access gap
Age:220 daysThis may require escalation.
78. Risk Movement
Section titled “78. Risk Movement”Track whether risk is:
Increasing
Stable
DecreasingExample:
Previous:Critical
Current:High
Trend:ImprovingThis helps management understand progress.
79. Risk Reassessment
Section titled “79. Risk Reassessment”After treatment, reassess.
Example:
Initial Residual:15 High
New Control:Phishing-resistant MFA
New Residual:8 ModerateRisk treatment should demonstrate actual reduction.
80. Treatment Effectiveness
Section titled “80. Treatment Effectiveness”Do not assume control implementation automatically reduces risk.
Validate:
-
Is the control deployed?
-
Is coverage complete?
-
Is it operating?
-
Has it been tested?
-
Are exceptions managed?
Then reassess residual risk.
81. Risk Acceptance Record
Section titled “81. Risk Acceptance Record”If accepted:
Risk ID
Residual Rating
Reason
Compensating Controls
Risk Owner
Approver
Acceptance Date
Expiration
ReviewThis should align with governance.
82. Risk Assessment Evidence Package
Section titled “82. Risk Assessment Evidence Package”A complete ISO risk assessment may include:
Risk Assessment Methodology
Asset / Service Inventory
Risk Register
Risk Workshop Records
Control Evidence
Risk Acceptance Criteria
Risk Treatment Decisions
Approval RecordsThis supports auditability.
83. Auditor Expectations
Section titled “83. Auditor Expectations”An ISO auditor may ask:
-
What methodology do you use?
-
How are likelihood and impact defined?
-
Can you show a recent risk assessment?
-
How do you identify risks?
-
Who owns them?
-
What treatment decisions were made?
-
How is acceptance authorized?
-
How do risk results influence the SoA?
You should be able to demonstrate the complete chain.
84. Risk-to-SoA Traceability
Section titled “84. Risk-to-SoA Traceability”Example:
Risk:Privileged account compromise ↓Treatment:Implement strong authentication ↓Control:Identity & authentication control ↓SoA:ApplicableThis is one of the most important ISO relationships.
85. Risk Assessment vs Annex A
Section titled “85. Risk Assessment vs Annex A”Do not start with:
Annex A checklist ↓Select everythingBetter:
Risk ↓Treatment ↓Control selection ↓Compare against Annex A ↓Document SoAAnnex A supports treatment, but risk should drive the process.
86. Common Risk Assessment Mistakes
Section titled “86. Common Risk Assessment Mistakes”Mistake 1 — Asset List Only
Section titled “Mistake 1 — Asset List Only”Listing assets is not the same as identifying risk.
Mistake 2 — Generic Risks
Section titled “Mistake 2 — Generic Risks”Example:
Malwarewithout explaining the business consequence.
Mistake 3 — No Defined Methodology
Section titled “Mistake 3 — No Defined Methodology”Ratings become inconsistent.
Mistake 4 — All Risks Are Critical
Section titled “Mistake 4 — All Risks Are Critical”Prioritization becomes meaningless.
Mistake 5 — Control Effectiveness Assumed
Section titled “Mistake 5 — Control Effectiveness Assumed”Controls should be evaluated.
Mistake 6 — No Risk Owners
Section titled “Mistake 6 — No Risk Owners”Risk decisions lack accountability.
Mistake 7 — No Acceptance Criteria
Section titled “Mistake 7 — No Acceptance Criteria”There is no consistent decision threshold.
Mistake 8 — Static Annual Risk Register
Section titled “Mistake 8 — Static Annual Risk Register”Significant changes should trigger reassessment.
Mistake 9 — No Link to Treatment
Section titled “Mistake 9 — No Link to Treatment”Assessment becomes documentation rather than management.
Mistake 10 — No Link to SoA
Section titled “Mistake 10 — No Link to SoA”Control selection becomes disconnected from risk.
87. Weak vs Strong Risk Assessment
Section titled “87. Weak vs Strong Risk Assessment”Risk:Phishing
Score:HighStrong
Section titled “Strong”Risk:Threat actors may compromise workforce credentials through phishing, resulting in unauthorized access to customer-facing systems.
Inherent:20 Critical
Controls:Email SecurityMFATraining
Effectiveness:Partial
Residual:12 High
Treatment:Deploy phishing-resistant MFA
Owner:CISOThe strong version supports governance and action.
88. Practical Activity — Build Risk Methodology
Section titled “88. Practical Activity — Build Risk Methodology”Create:
01 ISO Risk Assessment MethodologyInclude:
-
Risk definitions.
-
Likelihood scale.
-
Impact scale.
-
Risk matrix.
-
Acceptance criteria.
-
Ownership.
-
Treatment options.
-
Review frequency.
89. Practical Activity — Build Risk Register
Section titled “89. Practical Activity — Build Risk Register”Create:
02 ISO Information Security Risk RegisterRecommended fields:
Risk ID
Business Service
Asset
Threat
Vulnerability
Risk Statement
Likelihood
Impact
Inherent Risk
Existing Controls
Control Effectiveness
Residual Likelihood
Residual Impact
Residual Risk
Risk Owner
Treatment
Action
Due Date
Status90. Practical Activity — Identify Risks
Section titled “90. Practical Activity — Identify Risks”Create at least ten risks across:
Identity
Cloud
Application Security
Data
Third Party
Incident Response
Business Continuity
Physical Security
Governance
ComplianceWrite complete risk scenarios.
91. Practical Activity — Build Risk Acceptance Criteria
Section titled “91. Practical Activity — Build Risk Acceptance Criteria”Create:
03 Risk Acceptance CriteriaExample:
| Risk | Treatment Expectation |
|---|---|
| Low | May accept |
| Moderate | Owner decision |
| High | Treat or senior approval |
| Critical | Executive escalation |
Adapt to organizational governance.
92. Practical Activity — Build Treatment Decision Record
Section titled “92. Practical Activity — Build Treatment Decision Record”Create:
04 Risk Treatment Decision RegisterUse:
| Risk | Decision | Control/Action | Owner | Due |
|---|
This will prepare you for the next lesson.
93. Practical Activity — Build Risk Approval Record
Section titled “93. Practical Activity — Build Risk Approval Record”Create:
05 Risk Acceptance RecordInclude:
-
Risk.
-
Residual score.
-
Business justification.
-
Compensating controls.
-
Approver.
-
Expiration.
-
Review date.
94. Risk Assessment Checklist
Section titled “94. Risk Assessment Checklist”Before completing an assessment, verify:
-
Assessment scope defined.
-
Business services identified.
-
Assets identified.
-
Threats identified.
-
Vulnerabilities identified.
-
Risk statements documented.
-
Likelihood scored.
-
Impact scored.
-
Inherent risk calculated.
-
Existing controls identified.
-
Control effectiveness evaluated.
-
Residual risk calculated.
-
Risk owner assigned.
-
Acceptance criteria applied.
-
Treatment decision documented.
-
Approval captured.
-
Review frequency established.
95. GRC Analyst Responsibilities
Section titled “95. GRC Analyst Responsibilities”As a GRC professional, you may:
-
Maintain the risk methodology.
-
Facilitate assessment workshops.
-
Identify risk scenarios.
-
Guide scoring.
-
Challenge unsupported assumptions.
-
Maintain the risk register.
-
Coordinate control evidence.
-
Track risk owners.
-
Document treatment decisions.
-
Coordinate risk acceptance.
-
Monitor remediation.
-
Reassess residual risk.
-
Prepare risk reporting.
-
Link risk results to the SoA.
This is one of the core operational responsibilities in an ISO/IEC 27001 program.
96. Risk Assessment Governance
Section titled “96. Risk Assessment Governance”A practical model may be:
GRC ↓Facilitates Assessment
Business Owner ↓Provides Business Context
Security / Technology ↓Provides Technical Evidence
Risk Owner ↓Owns Risk Decision
Leadership ↓Approves Significant RiskRisk assessment should be collaborative.
97. Risk Assessment Maturity
Section titled “97. Risk Assessment Maturity”Level 1 — Ad Hoc
Section titled “Level 1 — Ad Hoc”UnstructuredInconsistent scoringLevel 2 — Defined
Section titled “Level 2 — Defined”MethodologyRisk RegisterOwnershipLevel 3 — Managed
Section titled “Level 3 — Managed”Treatment TrackingPeriodic ReviewEvidence-Based ScoringLevel 4 — Integrated
Section titled “Level 4 — Integrated”Risks Linked to ControlsSoAAuditsComplianceLevel 5 — Continuous
Section titled “Level 5 — Continuous”Continuous MonitoringDynamic Risk SignalsAutomated Reassessment98. Risk Assessment Mindset
Section titled “98. Risk Assessment Mindset”When performing an ISO risk assessment, ask:
What business service are we protecting?
What information matters?
What could happen?
Why could it happen?
How likely is it?
What would the business impact be?
Which controls already reduce risk?
How effective are those controls?
What risk remains?
Is that risk acceptable?
What treatment is required?
Who owns the decision?If these questions are answered clearly, the assessment is likely meaningful.
Key Takeaways
Section titled “Key Takeaways”-
ISO/IEC 27001 risk assessment should be structured, repeatable, and risk based.
-
Risk methodology should define likelihood, impact, scoring, acceptance criteria, and ownership.
-
Business services and information assets provide context for risk identification.
-
Threats and vulnerabilities should be translated into clear business-oriented risk scenarios.
-
Inherent risk is assessed before controls.
-
Control effectiveness should be evaluated rather than assumed.
-
Residual risk represents exposure remaining after controls.
-
Residual risk should be evaluated against approved acceptance criteria.
-
Every material risk should have an owner.
-
Risk treatment may involve mitigation, avoidance, transfer, or acceptance.
-
Risk assessments should be reviewed periodically and after significant change.
-
Risk results should directly influence the Risk Treatment Plan and Statement of Applicability.
-
GRC professionals facilitate, document, challenge, and govern the risk assessment process.
Knowledge Check
Section titled “Knowledge Check”Before continuing, make sure you can answer:
-
Why is risk assessment central to ISO/IEC 27001?
-
What should a risk methodology define?
-
What is risk criteria?
-
What are risk acceptance criteria?
-
What is inherent risk?
-
What is residual risk?
-
What is the difference between a threat and vulnerability?
-
What is a good risk statement?
-
Why should business services be identified?
-
What factors influence likelihood?
-
What factors influence impact?
-
Why should control effectiveness be evaluated?
-
What is risk evaluation?
-
What are the four common risk-treatment options?
-
What is the role of a risk owner?
-
When should risk reassessment occur?
-
Why should accepted risk be formally documented?
-
How does risk assessment connect to the Statement of Applicability?
-
Why should Annex A not be used as the starting point for risk assessment?
-
What role does GRC play in ISO risk assessment?
What’s Next?
Section titled “What’s Next?”➡️ Next: 07 — Risk Treatment Plan
In the next lesson, you will move from identifying and evaluating information-security risks into deciding how each unacceptable risk will be treated.
You will learn how to:
Review Residual Risk ↓Determine Treatment Strategy ↓Select Security Controls ↓Assign Control Owners ↓Define Remediation Actions ↓Establish Target Dates ↓Estimate Target Residual Risk ↓Obtain Risk Owner Approval ↓Track ImplementationYou will also build the practical artifacts needed for ISO/IEC 27001 implementation, including a Risk Treatment Plan, Risk Treatment Decision Matrix, Treatment Action Tracker, Residual Risk Approval Record, and Control Mapping Register.
These outputs will directly prepare you for the next major ISO artifact: the Statement of Applicability.