Skip to content

Runbook 02 — Registry Security Review

Property Value
Runbook Name Registry Security Review
Module Module 06 — Container Security
Runbook Number Runbook 02
Assessment Type Enterprise Container Registry Assessment
Estimated Duration 4–8 Hours
Audience Cloud Penetration Testers, Container Security Engineers, DevSecOps Engineers, Cloud Security Consultants
Framework GoHackersCloud Enterprise Container Security Assessment Framework

This runbook provides a standardized methodology for assessing enterprise container registries.

It enables consultants to evaluate authentication, authorization, repository governance, vulnerability management, image integrity, software supply chain controls, and operational security before production workloads consume container images.


Review:

  • Amazon Elastic Container Registry (ECR)
  • Azure Container Registry (ACR)
  • Google Artifact Registry (GAR)
  • Harbor Registry
  • Docker Hub Enterprise
  • Private Container Registries

Planning
Registry Discovery
Authentication Review
Authorization Review
Repository Assessment
Image Integrity Validation
Vulnerability Assessment
Logging & Monitoring
Governance Review
Risk Analysis
Reporting

  • Define assessment scope.
  • Identify registry platforms.
  • Review business-critical repositories.
  • Obtain required approvals.
  • Review registry architecture.
  • Registry inventory
  • Repository inventory
  • IAM documentation
  • Security policies
  • Previous assessment reports

Identify:

  • Registry platforms
  • Private repositories
  • Public repositories
  • Repository owners
  • Storage locations
  • Regional deployments
  • Registry availability
  • Business criticality
  • Environment classification
  • Ownership

Assess authentication mechanisms.

Review:

  • Identity Providers
  • Single Sign-On (SSO)
  • Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)
  • Service Accounts
  • Access Tokens
  • Robot Accounts
  • Strong authentication
  • MFA enforcement
  • Token lifecycle
  • Credential rotation

Review repository permissions.

Assess:

  • Administrative roles
  • Push permissions
  • Pull permissions
  • Read-only access
  • Team permissions
  • Least Privilege implementation
  • Excessive permissions
  • Anonymous access
  • Shared accounts
  • Unused privileged identities

Review:

  • Repository configuration
  • Public exposure
  • Immutable tags
  • Retention policies
  • Lifecycle management
  • Repository naming standards
  • Secure configuration
  • Governance compliance
  • Production segregation
  • Repository hygiene

Review:

  • Digital signatures
  • Trusted publishers
  • Image provenance
  • Artifact integrity
  • Image promotion workflow
  • Image signing
  • Signature verification
  • Trusted build pipeline
  • Approved images only

Review:

  • Automatic vulnerability scanning
  • Scan frequency
  • Critical findings
  • High-risk findings
  • Remediation timelines
  • Exception handling
  • Scanning before deployment
  • Continuous rescanning
  • Security policy enforcement

Review:

  • Authentication logs
  • Repository activity
  • Image uploads
  • Image downloads
  • Administrative changes
  • Permission changes
  • Audit logs
  • SIEM integration
  • Alert generation
  • Log retention
  • Monitoring coverage

Review:

  • Registry standards
  • Image approval process
  • Change management
  • Secure SDLC
  • Software supply chain policies
  • Compliance requirements
  • Policy enforcement
  • Ownership
  • Periodic reviews
  • Continuous improvement

Classify findings using enterprise risk ratings.

Severity Description
Critical Immediate production risk
High Significant registry weakness
Medium Security improvement required
Low Minor security issue
Informational Best practice recommendation

Prioritize findings based on:

  • Business impact
  • Exploitability
  • Repository criticality
  • Supply chain risk
  • Compliance impact

Collect evidence including:

  • Repository configuration
  • IAM permissions
  • Registry policies
  • Vulnerability reports
  • Image signature verification
  • Audit logs
  • CLI outputs
  • Architecture diagrams
  • Security policies
  • Screenshots

Ensure all evidence is securely stored and properly documented.


Produce:

  • Executive Summary
  • Registry Security Assessment Report
  • Repository Inventory
  • IAM Review
  • Vulnerability Assessment
  • Risk Register
  • Security Scorecard
  • Remediation Roadmap

Enterprise registry reviews frequently identify:

  • Public repositories exposing sensitive images
  • Overly permissive repository access
  • Missing Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)
  • Unsigned production images
  • Weak lifecycle management
  • Outdated container images
  • Missing vulnerability scanning
  • Incomplete audit logging
  • Poor repository governance
  • Weak software supply chain controls

  • Enforce least privilege access.
  • Require MFA for administrative users.
  • Enable immutable image tags.
  • Sign all production container images.
  • Continuously scan repositories for vulnerabilities.
  • Integrate registry logs with the enterprise SIEM.
  • Enforce secure image promotion workflows.
  • Remove unused repositories and stale images.
  • Review repository permissions regularly.
  • Maintain strong governance over the software supply chain.

The registry assessment is complete when:

  • All enterprise registries have been reviewed.
  • Authentication and authorization controls have been validated.
  • Repository governance has been assessed.
  • Image integrity has been verified.
  • Vulnerability management has been evaluated.
  • Risks have been prioritized.
  • Executive and technical reports have been completed.

This runbook provides a repeatable methodology for conducting enterprise container registry security assessments using the GoHackersCloud Enterprise Container Security Assessment Framework.

Following this process enables Cloud Penetration Testers and Cloud Security Consultants to consistently assess authentication, authorization, repository governance, image integrity, software supply chain controls, vulnerability management, and operational maturity while delivering executive-ready consulting reports.


➡️ Runbook 03 — Enterprise Container Investigation

In the next runbook, you will perform an end-to-end enterprise container security investigation by analyzing Docker environments, Kubernetes clusters, runtime security events, software supply chain controls, governance, and business risks to produce a comprehensive executive-level security assessment.