Runbook 02 — Registry Security Review
Runbook Information
Section titled “Runbook Information”| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Runbook Name | Registry Security Review |
| Module | Module 06 — Container Security |
| Runbook Number | Runbook 02 |
| Assessment Type | Enterprise Container Registry Assessment |
| Estimated Duration | 4–8 Hours |
| Audience | Cloud Penetration Testers, Container Security Engineers, DevSecOps Engineers, Cloud Security Consultants |
| Framework | GoHackersCloud Enterprise Container Security Assessment Framework |
Purpose
Section titled “Purpose”This runbook provides a standardized methodology for assessing enterprise container registries.
It enables consultants to evaluate authentication, authorization, repository governance, vulnerability management, image integrity, software supply chain controls, and operational security before production workloads consume container images.
Assessment Scope
Section titled “Assessment Scope”Review:
- Amazon Elastic Container Registry (ECR)
- Azure Container Registry (ACR)
- Google Artifact Registry (GAR)
- Harbor Registry
- Docker Hub Enterprise
- Private Container Registries
Assessment Methodology
Section titled “Assessment Methodology”Planning
↓
Registry Discovery
↓
Authentication Review
↓
Authorization Review
↓
Repository Assessment
↓
Image Integrity Validation
↓
Vulnerability Assessment
↓
Logging & Monitoring
↓
Governance Review
↓
Risk Analysis
↓
ReportingPhase 1 — Planning
Section titled “Phase 1 — Planning”Objectives
Section titled “Objectives”- Define assessment scope.
- Identify registry platforms.
- Review business-critical repositories.
- Obtain required approvals.
- Review registry architecture.
Collect
Section titled “Collect”- Registry inventory
- Repository inventory
- IAM documentation
- Security policies
- Previous assessment reports
Phase 2 — Registry Discovery
Section titled “Phase 2 — Registry Discovery”Identify:
- Registry platforms
- Private repositories
- Public repositories
- Repository owners
- Storage locations
- Regional deployments
Validate
Section titled “Validate”- Registry availability
- Business criticality
- Environment classification
- Ownership
Phase 3 — Authentication Review
Section titled “Phase 3 — Authentication Review”Assess authentication mechanisms.
Review:
- Identity Providers
- Single Sign-On (SSO)
- Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)
- Service Accounts
- Access Tokens
- Robot Accounts
Validate
Section titled “Validate”- Strong authentication
- MFA enforcement
- Token lifecycle
- Credential rotation
Phase 4 — Authorization Review
Section titled “Phase 4 — Authorization Review”Review repository permissions.
Assess:
- Administrative roles
- Push permissions
- Pull permissions
- Read-only access
- Team permissions
- Least Privilege implementation
Identify
Section titled “Identify”- Excessive permissions
- Anonymous access
- Shared accounts
- Unused privileged identities
Phase 5 — Repository Assessment
Section titled “Phase 5 — Repository Assessment”Review:
- Repository configuration
- Public exposure
- Immutable tags
- Retention policies
- Lifecycle management
- Repository naming standards
Validate
Section titled “Validate”- Secure configuration
- Governance compliance
- Production segregation
- Repository hygiene
Phase 6 — Image Integrity Validation
Section titled “Phase 6 — Image Integrity Validation”Review:
- Digital signatures
- Trusted publishers
- Image provenance
- Artifact integrity
- Image promotion workflow
Validate
Section titled “Validate”- Image signing
- Signature verification
- Trusted build pipeline
- Approved images only
Phase 7 — Vulnerability Assessment
Section titled “Phase 7 — Vulnerability Assessment”Review:
- Automatic vulnerability scanning
- Scan frequency
- Critical findings
- High-risk findings
- Remediation timelines
- Exception handling
Validate
Section titled “Validate”- Scanning before deployment
- Continuous rescanning
- Security policy enforcement
Phase 8 — Logging & Monitoring
Section titled “Phase 8 — Logging & Monitoring”Review:
- Authentication logs
- Repository activity
- Image uploads
- Image downloads
- Administrative changes
- Permission changes
- Audit logs
Validate
Section titled “Validate”- SIEM integration
- Alert generation
- Log retention
- Monitoring coverage
Phase 9 — Governance Review
Section titled “Phase 9 — Governance Review”Review:
- Registry standards
- Image approval process
- Change management
- Secure SDLC
- Software supply chain policies
- Compliance requirements
Validate
Section titled “Validate”- Policy enforcement
- Ownership
- Periodic reviews
- Continuous improvement
Phase 10 — Risk Analysis
Section titled “Phase 10 — Risk Analysis”Classify findings using enterprise risk ratings.
| Severity | Description |
|---|---|
| Critical | Immediate production risk |
| High | Significant registry weakness |
| Medium | Security improvement required |
| Low | Minor security issue |
| Informational | Best practice recommendation |
Prioritize findings based on:
- Business impact
- Exploitability
- Repository criticality
- Supply chain risk
- Compliance impact
Evidence Collection
Section titled “Evidence Collection”Collect evidence including:
- Repository configuration
- IAM permissions
- Registry policies
- Vulnerability reports
- Image signature verification
- Audit logs
- CLI outputs
- Architecture diagrams
- Security policies
- Screenshots
Ensure all evidence is securely stored and properly documented.
Assessment Deliverables
Section titled “Assessment Deliverables”Produce:
- Executive Summary
- Registry Security Assessment Report
- Repository Inventory
- IAM Review
- Vulnerability Assessment
- Risk Register
- Security Scorecard
- Remediation Roadmap
Common Findings
Section titled “Common Findings”Enterprise registry reviews frequently identify:
- Public repositories exposing sensitive images
- Overly permissive repository access
- Missing Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)
- Unsigned production images
- Weak lifecycle management
- Outdated container images
- Missing vulnerability scanning
- Incomplete audit logging
- Poor repository governance
- Weak software supply chain controls
Enterprise Best Practices
Section titled “Enterprise Best Practices”- Enforce least privilege access.
- Require MFA for administrative users.
- Enable immutable image tags.
- Sign all production container images.
- Continuously scan repositories for vulnerabilities.
- Integrate registry logs with the enterprise SIEM.
- Enforce secure image promotion workflows.
- Remove unused repositories and stale images.
- Review repository permissions regularly.
- Maintain strong governance over the software supply chain.
Success Criteria
Section titled “Success Criteria”The registry assessment is complete when:
- All enterprise registries have been reviewed.
- Authentication and authorization controls have been validated.
- Repository governance has been assessed.
- Image integrity has been verified.
- Vulnerability management has been evaluated.
- Risks have been prioritized.
- Executive and technical reports have been completed.
Runbook Summary
Section titled “Runbook Summary”This runbook provides a repeatable methodology for conducting enterprise container registry security assessments using the GoHackersCloud Enterprise Container Security Assessment Framework.
Following this process enables Cloud Penetration Testers and Cloud Security Consultants to consistently assess authentication, authorization, repository governance, image integrity, software supply chain controls, vulnerability management, and operational maturity while delivering executive-ready consulting reports.
Next Runbook
Section titled “Next Runbook”➡️ Runbook 03 — Enterprise Container Investigation
In the next runbook, you will perform an end-to-end enterprise container security investigation by analyzing Docker environments, Kubernetes clusters, runtime security events, software supply chain controls, governance, and business risks to produce a comprehensive executive-level security assessment.